From 9d741c2c762d8b629cef5ac5fbc26ca44c345a77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prefetch
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:41:32 +0100
Subject: Expand knowledge base

---
 content/know/concept/lagrange-multiplier/index.pdc | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'content/know/concept/lagrange-multiplier/index.pdc')

diff --git a/content/know/concept/lagrange-multiplier/index.pdc b/content/know/concept/lagrange-multiplier/index.pdc
index 2b14897..fffe85f 100644
--- a/content/know/concept/lagrange-multiplier/index.pdc
+++ b/content/know/concept/lagrange-multiplier/index.pdc
@@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ Solving this directly would be a delicate balancing act
 of all the partial derivatives.
 
 To help us solve this, we introduce a "dummy" parameter $\lambda$,
-the so-called **Lagrange multiplier**, and contruct a new function $L$ given by:
+the so-called **Lagrange multiplier**,
+which need not be constant,
+and contruct a new function $L$ given by:
 
 $$\begin{aligned}
     L(x, y, z) = f(x, y, z) + \lambda \phi(x, y, z)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3