--- title: "Hagen-Poiseuille equation" firstLetter: "H" publishDate: 2021-04-13 categories: - Physics - Fluid mechanics - Fluid dynamics date: 2021-04-13T10:42:46+02:00 draft: false markup: pandoc --- # Hagen-Poiseuille equation The **Hagen-Poiseuille equation**, or simply the **Poiseuille equation**, describes the flow of a fluid with nonzero [viscosity](/know/concept/viscosity/) through a cylindrical pipe. Due to its viscosity, the fluid clings to the sides, limiting the amount that can pass through, for a pipe with radius $R$. Consider the [Navier-Stokes equations](/know/concept/navier-stokes-equations/) of an incompressible fluid with spatially uniform density $\rho$. Assuming that the flow is steady $\pdv*{\va{v}}{t} = 0$, and that gravity is negligible $\va{g} = 0$, we get: $$\begin{aligned} (\va{v} \cdot \nabla) \va{v} = - \frac{\nabla p}{\rho} + \nu \nabla^2 \va{v} \qquad \quad \nabla \cdot \va{v} = 0 \end{aligned}$$ Into this, we insert the ansatz $\va{v} = \vu{e}_z \: v_z(r)$, where $\vu{e}_z$ is the $z$-axis' unit vector. In other words, we assume that the flow velocity depends only on $r$; not on $\phi$ or $z$. Plugging this into the Navier-Stokes equations, $\nabla \cdot \va{v}$ is trivially zero, and in the other equation we multiply out $\rho$, yielding this, where $\eta = \rho \nu$ is the dynamic viscosity: $$\begin{aligned} \nabla p = \vu{e}_z \: \eta \nabla^2 v_z \end{aligned}$$ Because only $\vu{e}_z$ appears on the right-hand side, only the $z$-component of $\nabla p$ can be nonzero. However, $v_z(r)$ is a function of $r$, not $z$! The left thus only depends on $z$, and the right only on $r$, meaning that both sides must equal a constant, which we call $-G$: $$\begin{aligned} \dv{p}{z} = -G \qquad \quad \eta \frac{1}{r} \dv{r} \Big( r \dv{v_z}{r} \Big) = - G \end{aligned}$$ The former equation, for $p(z)$, is easy to solve. We get an integration constant $p(0)$: $$\begin{aligned} p(z) = p(0) - G z \end{aligned}$$ This gives meaning to the **pressure gradient** $G$: for a pipe of length $L$, it describes the pressure difference $\Delta p = p(0) - p(L)$ that is driving the fluid, i.e. $G = \Delta p / L$ As for the latter equation, for $v_z(r)$, we start by integrating it once, introducing a constant $A$: $$\begin{aligned} \dv{r} \Big( r \dv{v_z}{r} \Big) = - \frac{G}{\eta} r \quad \implies \quad \dv{v_z}{r} = - \frac{G}{2 \eta} r + \frac{A}{r} \end{aligned}$$ Integrating this one more time, thereby introducing another constant $B$, we arrive at: $$\begin{aligned} v_z = - \frac{G}{4 \eta} r^2 + A \ln{r} + B \end{aligned}$$ The velocity must be finite at $r = 0$, so we set $A = 0$. Furthermore, the Navier-Stokes equation's *no-slip* condition demands that $v_z = 0$ at the boundary $r = R$, so $B = G R^2 / (4 \eta)$. This brings us to the **Poiseuille solution** for $v_z(r)$: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ v_z(r) = \frac{G}{4 \eta} (R^2 - r^2) } \end{aligned}$$ How much fluid can pass through the pipe per unit time? This is denoted by the **volumetric flow rate** $Q$, which is the integral of $v_z$ over the circular cross-section: $$\begin{aligned} Q = 2 \pi \int_0^R v_z(r) \: r \dd{r} = \frac{\pi G}{2 \eta} \int_0^R R^2 r - r^3 \dd{r} = \frac{\pi G}{2 \eta} \bigg[ \frac{R^2 r^2}{2} - \frac{r^4}{4} \bigg]_0^R \end{aligned}$$ We thus arrive at the main Hagen-Poiseuille equation, which predicts $Q$ for a given setup: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ Q = \frac{\pi G R^4}{8 \eta} } \end{aligned}$$ Consequently, the average flow velocity $\expval{v_z}$ is simply $Q$ divided by the cross-sectional area: $$\begin{aligned} \expval{v_z} = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2} = \frac{G R^2}{8 \eta} \end{aligned}$$ The fluid's viscous stickiness means it exerts a drag force $D$ on the pipe as it flows. For a pipe of length $L$ and radius $R$, we calculate $D$ by multiplying the internal area $2 \pi R L$ by the [shear stress](/know/concept/cauchy-stress-tensor/) $-\sigma_{zr}$ on the wall (i.e. the wall applies $\sigma_{zr}$, the fluid responds with $- \sigma_{zr}$): $$\begin{aligned} D = - 2 \pi R L \: \sigma_{zr} \big|_{r = R} = - 2 \pi R L \eta \dv{v_z}{r}\Big|_{r = R} = 2 \pi R L \eta \frac{G R}{2 \eta} = \pi R^2 L G \end{aligned}$$ We would like to get rid of $G$ for being impractical, so we substitute $R^2 G = 8 \eta \expval{v_z}$, yielding: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ D = 8 \pi \eta L \expval{v_z} } \end{aligned}$$ Due to this drag, the pressure difference $\Delta p = p(0) - p(L)$ does work on the fluid, at a rate $P$, since power equals force (i.e. pressure times area) times velocity: $$\begin{aligned} P = 2 \pi \int_0^R \Delta p \: v_z(r) \: r \dd{r} \end{aligned}$$ Because $\Delta p$ is independent of $r$, we get the same integral we used to calculate $Q$. Then, thanks to the fact that $\Delta p = G L$ and $Q = \pi R^2 \expval{v_z}$, it follows that: $$\begin{aligned} P = \Delta p \: Q = G L \pi R^2 \expval{v_z} = D \expval{v_z} \end{aligned}$$ In conclusion, the power $P$, needed to drive a fluid through the pipe at a rate $Q$, is given by: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ P = 8 \pi \eta L \expval{v_z}^2 } \end{aligned}$$ ## References 1. B. Lautrup, *Physics of continuous matter: exotic and everyday phenomena in the macroscopic world*, 2nd edition, CRC Press.