--- title: "Time-ordered product" firstLetter: "T" publishDate: 2021-09-13 categories: - Physics - Quantum mechanics date: 2021-09-13T19:58:33+02:00 draft: false markup: pandoc --- # Time-ordered product In quantum mechanics, especially quantum field theory, a **time-ordered product** is a product of explicitly time-dependent operators, subject to certain ordering constraints. Let us start with an unusual motivation. Suppose that some time-dependent operator $\hat{A}(t)$ is defined like so, as a product of $N$ time-dependent sub-operators $\hat{a}_n(t)$: $$\begin{aligned} \hat{A}(t) \equiv \int_0^{t} \hat{a}_1(t_1) \bigg( \int_0^{t_1} \hat{a}_2(t_2) \bigg( \int_0^{t_2} \hat{a}_3(t_3) \bigg( \cdots \bigg) \dd{t_3} \bigg) \dd{t_2} \bigg) \dd{t_1} \end{aligned}$$ Crucially, the upper limits of the inner integrals depend on the surrounding variables, meaning that these integrals cannot simply be reordered. An interpretation is that the rightmost $\hat{a}_N(t_N)$ is applied first, and then $\hat{a}_{N-1}(t_{N-1})$ secondly with $t_{N-1} > t_N$, and so on. This suggests there is a form of "time-ordering" here: the integrals sweep across all relative timings of $\hat{a}_n$, but preserve the ordering. Indeed, this could be rewritten as a time-ordered product (see the [interaction picture](/know/concept/interaction-picture/) for an example). A more general and intuitive motivation goes as follows. Suppose we have a product of $N$ time-dependent operators $\hat{a}_n(t)$, each representing a certain event. Clearly, we would want to apply them in chronological order: $$\begin{aligned} \hat{a}_N(t_N) \: \hat{a}_{N-1}(t_{N-1}) \: \cdots \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) \: \hat{a}_1(t_1) \qquad \mathrm{where} \qquad t_N > t_{N-1} > ... > \: t_2 > t_1 \end{aligned}$$ But what if the ordering of the arguments $t_N, ..., t_1$ is not known in advance? We thus define the **time-ordering meta-operator** $\mathcal{T}$, which reorders the operators based on the $t$-values such that they are always in chronological order. For example: $$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T} \big\{ \hat{a}_1(t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) \big\} \equiv \begin{cases} \hat{a}_1(t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) & \mathrm{if} \; t_2 < t_1 \\ \hat{a}_2(t_2) \: \hat{a}_1(t_1) & \mathrm{if} \; t_1 < t_2 \end{cases} \end{aligned}$$ This example suggests a general algorithm for $\mathcal{T}$: we need to consider every permutation of the operators $\hat{a}_n(t_n)$, and leave only the single one that satisfies our demands. Mathematically, we do this by summing up all permutations, and multiplying each term with a product of [Heaviside step functions](/know/concept/heaviside-step-function/) $\Theta$, which remove the term if the ordering is wrong: $$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T} \big\{ \hat{a}_1 \cdots \hat{a}_N \big\} \equiv \sum_{p \in P_N}^{} \Theta\big(t_{p_1} \!\!-\! t_{p_2}\big) \cdots \Theta\big(t_{p_{N-1}} \!\!-\! t_{p_N}\big) \: \hat{a}_{p_1}(t_{p_1}) \: \cdots \: \hat{a}_{p_N}(t_{p_N}) \end{aligned}$$ With this, our earlier example for two operators $\hat{a}_1$ and $\hat{a}_2$ takes the following form: $$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T} \big\{ \hat{a}_1(t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) \big\} = \Theta(t_1 - t_2) \: \hat{a}_1(t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) + \Theta(t_2 - t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) \: \hat{a}_1(t_1) \end{aligned}$$ However, we are still missing an important detail: so far, we have quietly been assuming that the operators are bosonic (see [second quantization](/know/concept/second-quantization/)). To include fermionic operators, we must allow the sign of each term to change, based on whether the permutation is even or odd: $$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T} \big\{ \hat{a}_1(t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) \big\} = \Theta(t_1 - t_2) \: \hat{a}_1(t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) \pm \Theta(t_2 - t_1) \: \hat{a}_2(t_2) \: \hat{a}_1(t_1) \end{aligned}$$ Where $\pm$ is $+$ for bosons, and $-$ for fermions in this case. The general definition of $\mathcal{T}$ is: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \mathcal{T} \big\{ \hat{a}_1 \cdots \hat{a}_N \big\} \equiv \sum_{p \in P_N}^{} (\pm 1)^p \bigg( \prod_{j = 1}^{N-1} \Theta\big(t_{p_j} \!-\! t_{p_{j+1}}\big) \bigg) \bigg( \prod_{k = 1}^N \hat{a}_{p_k}(t_{p_k}) \bigg) } \end{aligned}$$ ## References 1. H. Bruus, K. Flensberg, *Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics*, 2016, Oxford.