From 6b51a2bf7d43f9f83e668d0b97d24640da79e44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Prefetch Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:49:41 +0200 Subject: Expand knowledge base --- .../know/concept/lorentz-oscillator-model/index.md | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+) create mode 100644 source/know/concept/lorentz-oscillator-model/index.md (limited to 'source/know/concept/lorentz-oscillator-model') diff --git a/source/know/concept/lorentz-oscillator-model/index.md b/source/know/concept/lorentz-oscillator-model/index.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61bbf6b --- /dev/null +++ b/source/know/concept/lorentz-oscillator-model/index.md @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +--- +title: "Lorentz oscillator model" +sort_title: "Lorentz oscillator model" +date: 2024-04-09 +categories: +- Physics +- Optics +- Electromagnetism +layout: "concept" +--- + +The **Lorentz oscillator model** or **dipole oscillator model** +is a classical description of light-matter interaction, +which treats the charged particles inside a solid as forming dipoles +that get pushed around by the electric field of passing light waves. +Quantitatively, it is of limited use, as it ignores quantum mechanics, +but qualitatively it captures the essential features. +It is similar to the [Drude model](/know/concept/drude-model/), +but applies to insulators instead of conductors. + +In insulators, the valence electrons are bound +to an immobile nucleus at a certain equilibrium distance +(this is a classical model, so we treat the electron as a particle). +If an [electric field](/know/concept/electric-field/) $$\vb{E}$$ +moves the electron, a restoring force brings it back to equilibrium, +so we can pretend that it is connected to the nucleus by a spring. +In other words, we treat it as a [harmonic oscillator](/know/concept/harmonic-oscillator/), +whose spring constant $$K$$ should be chosen such that: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \omega_0 = \sqrt{\frac{K}{m}} +\end{aligned}$$ + +Where $$m$$ is the electron's mass, and the resonance $$\omega_0$$ +is an empirically determined transition frequency of the atom. +When an [electromagnetic wave](/know/concept/electromagnetic-wave-equation/) +travels through the material, its electric field +$$\vb{E}(t) = \vb{E}_0 e^{-i \omega t}$$ displaces +the electron by an amount $$\vb{x}(t)$$ governed by: + +$$\begin{aligned} + m \dvn{2}{\vb{x}}{t} + &= q \vb{E} - m \gamma \dv{\vb{x}}{t} - K \vb{x} +\end{aligned}$$ + +Where $$q < 0$$ is the electron's charge, +and $$\gamma$$ represents a weak damping effect. +The four terms represent Newton's second law, +the [Lorentz force](/know/concept/lorentz-force/), +the spring's damping force, and the spring's restoring force, respectively. + +Inserting the ansatz $$\vb{x}(t) = \vb{x}_0 e^{- i \omega t}$$ +and isolating for the amplitude $$\vb{x}_0$$, we find: + +$$\begin{gathered} + \vb{x}_0 + = \frac{q \vb{E}_0}{m (\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i \gamma \omega)} +\end{gathered}$$ + +The polarization density $$\vb{P}(t)$$ is therefore as shown below, +where $$N$$ is the number of atoms per unit of volume. +Note that the dipole moment vector $$\vb{p}$$ is defined +as pointing from negative to positive, +whereas the electric field $$\vb{E}$$ goes from positive to negative: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \vb{P}(t) + = N \vb{p}(t) + = N q \vb{x}(t) + = \frac{N q^2}{m (\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i \gamma \omega)} \vb{E}(t) +\end{aligned}$$ + +From the definition of the electric displacement field +$$\vb{D} = \varepsilon_0 \vb{E} + \vb{P} = \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_r \vb{E}$$, +we find that the material's +[dielectric function](/know/concept/dielectric-function/) +$$\varepsilon_r(\omega)$$ is given by: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \boxed{ + \varepsilon_r(\omega) + = 1 + \frac{N q^2}{\varepsilon_0 m (\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i \gamma \omega)} + } +\end{aligned}$$ + +You may recognize the Drude model's plasma frequency $$\omega_p$$ here, +but the concept of plasma oscillation does not apply +because there are no conduction electrons. + +When the light's driving frequency $$\omega$$ is far from the resonance $$\omega_0$$, +we see that the "background" permittivity is higher at lower frequencies: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \varepsilon_{\mathrm{low}} + &= \, \lim_{\omega \to 0} \, \varepsilon_r(\omega) = 1 + \frac{N q^2}{\varepsilon_0 m \omega_0^2} + \\ + \varepsilon_{\mathrm{high}} + &= \lim_{\omega \to \infty} \varepsilon_r(\omega) = 1 +\end{aligned}$$ + +Using these limits, we can rewrite our previous expression for $$\varepsilon_r$$ as follows: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \varepsilon_r(\omega) + = \varepsilon_{\mathrm{high}} + + (\varepsilon_{\mathrm{low}} - \varepsilon_{\mathrm{high}}) \frac{\omega_0^2}{\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i \gamma \omega} +\end{aligned}$$ + +In reality, atoms have multiple spectral lines, +so we should treat them as if they have multiple oscillators +with different resonances $$\omega_\nu$$. +In that case, the relative permittivity $$\varepsilon_r$$ becomes: + + +$$\begin{aligned} + \boxed{ + \varepsilon_r(\omega) + = 1 + \frac{N q^2}{\varepsilon_0 m} \sum_{\nu} \frac{1}{(\omega_\nu^2 - \omega^2 - i \gamma_\nu \omega)} + } +\end{aligned}$$ + +This gives $$\varepsilon_r$$ the shape of a staircase, +descending from low to high $$\omega$$ in clear steps at each $$\omega_\nu$$. +Around each such resonance there is a distinctive "squiggle" in $$\Real\{\varepsilon_r\}$$ +corresponding to a peak in the material's reflectivity, +and there is an absorption peak in $$\Imag\{\varepsilon_r\}$$. +The damping from $$\gamma_\nu$$ broadens those peaks and reduces their amplitude. + + + +## References +1. M. Fox, + *Optical properties of solids*, 2nd edition, + Oxford. -- cgit v1.2.3