--- title: "Fredholm alternative" sort_title: "Fredholm alternative" date: 2021-05-29 categories: - Mathematics layout: "concept" --- The **Fredholm alternative** is a theorem regarding equations involving a linear operator $$\hat{L}$$ on a [Hilbert space](/know/concept/hilbert-space/), and is useful in the context of multiple-scale perturbation theory. It is an *alternative* because it gives two mutually exclusive options, given here in [Dirac notation](/know/concept/dirac-notation/): 1. $$\hat{L} \Ket{u} = \Ket{f}$$ has a unique solution $$\Ket{u}$$ for every $$\Ket{f}$$. 2. $$\hat{L}^\dagger \Ket{w} = 0$$ has non-zero solutions. Then regarding $$\hat{L} \Ket{u} = \Ket{f}$$: 1. If $$\Inprod{w}{f} = 0$$ for all $$\Ket{w}$$, then it has infinitely many solutions $$\Ket{u}$$. 2. If $$\Inprod{w}{f} \neq 0$$ for any $$\Ket{w}$$, then it has no solutions $$\Ket{u}$$. Where $$\hat{L}^\dagger$$ is the adjoint of $$\hat{L}$$. In other words, $$\hat{L} \Ket{u} = \Ket{f}$$ has non-trivial solutions if and only if for all $$\Ket{w}$$ (including the trivial case $$\Ket{w} = 0$$) it holds that $$\Inprod{w}{f} = 0$$. As a specific example, if $$\hat{L}$$ is a matrix and the kets are vectors, this theorem can alternatively be stated as follows using the determinant: 1. If $$\mathrm{det}(\hat{L}) \neq 0$$, then $$\hat{L} \vec{u} = \vec{f}$$ has a unique solution $$\vec{u}$$ for every $$\vec{f}$$. 2. If $$\mathrm{det}(\hat{L}) = 0$$, then $$\hat{L}^\dagger \vec{w} = \vec{0}$$ has non-zero solutions. Then regarding $$\hat{L} \vec{u} = \vec{f}$$: 1. If $$\vec{w} \cdot \vec{f} = 0$$ for all $$\vec{w}$$, then it has infinitely many solutions $$\vec{u}$$. 2. If $$\vec{w} \cdot \vec{f} \neq 0$$ for any $$\vec{w}$$, then it has no solutions $$\vec{u}$$. Consequently, the Fredholm alternative is also brought up in the context of eigenvalue problems. Define $$\hat{M} = (\hat{L} - \lambda \hat{I})$$, where $$\lambda$$ is an eigenvalue of $$\hat{L}$$ if and only if $$\mathrm{det}(\hat{M}) = 0$$. Then for the equation $$\hat{M} \Ket{u} = \Ket{f}$$, we can say that: 1. If $$\lambda$$ is *not* an eigenvalue, then there is a unique solution $$\Ket{u}$$ for each $$\Ket{f}$$. 2. If $$\lambda$$ is an eigenvalue, then $$\hat{M}^\dagger \Ket{w} = 0$$ has non-zero solutions. Then: 1. If $$\Inprod{w}{f} = 0$$ for all $$\Ket{w}$$, then there are infinitely many solutions $$\Ket{u}$$. 2. If $$\Inprod{w}{f} \neq 0$$ for any $$\Ket{w}$$, then there are no solutions $$\Ket{u}$$. ## References 1. O. Bang, *Nonlinear mathematical physics: lecture notes*, 2020, unpublished.