--- title: "Legendre transform" sort_title: "Legendre transform" date: 2021-02-22 categories: - Mathematics - Physics layout: "concept" --- The **Legendre transform** of a function $$f(x)$$ is a new function $$L(f')$$, which depends only on the derivative $$f'(x)$$ of $$f(x)$$, and from which the original function $$f(x)$$ can be reconstructed. The point is that $$L(f')$$ contains the same information as $$f(x)$$, just in a different form, analogously to e.g. the [Fourier transform](/know/concept/fourier-transform/). Let us choose an arbitrary point $$x_0 \in [a, b]$$ in the domain of $$f(x)$$. Consider a line $$y(x)$$ tangent to $$f(x)$$ at $$x = x_0$$, which must have slope $$f'(x_0)$$, and intersects the $$y$$-axis at $$-C$$: $$\begin{aligned} y(x) = f'(x_0) (x - x_0) + f(x_0) = f'(x_0) \: x - C \end{aligned}$$ Where $$C \equiv f'(x_0) \: x_0 - f(x_0)$$. We now define the Legendre transform $$L(f')$$ such that for all $$x_0 \in [a, b]$$ we have $$L(f'(x_0)) = C$$ (some authors use $$-C$$ instead). Renaming $$x_0$$ to $$x$$: $$\begin{aligned} L(f'(x)) = f'(x) \: x - f(x) \end{aligned}$$ We want this function to depend only on the derivative $$f'$$, but currently $$x$$ still appears here as a variable. We fix this problem in the easiest possible way: by assuming that $$f'(x)$$ is invertible for all $$x \in [a, b]$$. If $$x(f')$$ is the inverse of $$f'(x)$$, then $$L(f')$$ is given by: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ L(f') = f' \: x(f') - f(x(f')) } \end{aligned}$$ The only requirement for the existence of the Legendre transform is thus the invertibility of $$f'(x)$$ in the target interval $$[a,b]$$, which can only be true if $$f(x)$$ is either convex or concave, meaning its derivative $$f'(x)$$ is monotonic. The derivative of $$L(f')$$ with respect to $$f'$$ is simply $$x(f')$$. In other words, the roles of $$f'$$ and $$x$$ are switched by the transformation: the coordinate becomes the derivative and vice versa: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \dv{L}{f'} = f' \dv{x}{f'} + x(f') - f' \dv{x}{f'} = x(f') } \end{aligned}$$ Furthermore, Legendre transformation is an *involution*, meaning it is its own inverse. To show this, let $$g(L')$$ be the Legendre transform of $$L(f')$$: $$\begin{aligned} g(L') = L' \: f'(L') - L(f'(L')) = x(f') \: f' - f' \: x(f') + f(x(f')) = f(x) \end{aligned}$$ Moreover, a Legendre transform is always invertible, because the transform of a convex function is itself convex. Convexity of $$f(x)$$ means that $$f''(x) > 0$$ for all $$x \in [a, b]$$, so a proof is: $$\begin{aligned} L''(f') = \dv{}{f'} \Big( \dv{L}{f'} \Big) = \dv{x(f')}{f'} = \dv{x}{f'(x)} = \frac{1}{f''(x)} > 0 \end{aligned}$$ And an analogous proof exists for concave functions where $$f''(x) < 0$$. Legendre transformation is important in physics, since it connects [Lagrangian](/know/concept/lagrangian-mechanics/) and [Hamiltonian](/know/concept/hamiltonian-mechanics/) mechanics to each other. It is also used to convert between [thermodynamic potentials](/know/concept/thermodynamic-potential/). ## References 1. H. Gould, J. Tobochnik, *Statistical and thermal physics*, 2nd edition, Princeton.