--- title: "Rotating wave approximation" sort_title: "Rotating wave approximation" date: 2022-02-01 categories: - Physics - Quantum mechanics - Two-level system - Optics layout: "concept" --- Consider the following periodic perturbation $$\hat{H}_1$$ to a quantum system, which represents e.g. an [electromagnetic wave](/know/concept/electromagnetic-wave-equation/) in the [electric dipole approximation](/know/concept/electric-dipole-approximation/): $$\begin{aligned} \hat{H}_1(t) = \hat{V} \cos(\omega t) = \frac{\hat{V}}{2} \Big( e^{i \omega t} + e^{-i \omega t} \Big) \end{aligned}$$ Where $$\hat{V}$$ is some operator, and we assume that $$\omega$$ is fairly close to a resonance frequency $$\omega_0$$ of the system that is getting perturbed by $$\hat{H}_1$$. As an example, consider a two-level system consisting of states $$\Ket{g}$$ and $$\Ket{e}$$, with a resonance frequency $$\omega_0 = (E_e \!-\! E_g) / \hbar$$. From the derivation of [time-dependent perturbation theory](/know/concept/time-dependent-perturbation-theory/), we know that the state $$\Ket{\Psi} = c_g \Ket{g} + c_e \Ket{e}$$ evolves as: $$\begin{aligned} i \hbar \dv{c_g}{t} &= \matrixel{g}{\hat{H}_1(t)}{g} \: c_g(t) + \matrixel{g}{\hat{H}_1(t)}{e} \: c_e(t) \: e^{- i \omega_0 t} \\ i \hbar \dv{c_e}{t} &= \matrixel{e}{\hat{H}_1(t)}{g} \: c_g(t) \: e^{i \omega_0 t} + \matrixel{e}{\hat{H}_1(t)}{e} \: c_e(t) \end{aligned}$$ Typically, $$\hat{V}$$ has odd spatial parity, in which case [Laporte's selection rule](/know/concept/selection-rules/) reduces this to: $$\begin{aligned} \dv{c_g}{t} &= \frac{1}{i \hbar} \matrixel{g}{\hat{H}_1}{e} \: c_e \: e^{- i \omega_0 t} \\ \dv{c_e}{t} &= \frac{1}{i \hbar} \matrixel{e}{\hat{H}_1}{g} \: c_g \: e^{i \omega_0 t} \end{aligned}$$ We now insert the general $$\hat{H}_1$$ defined above, and define $$V_{eg} \equiv \matrixel{e}{\hat{V}}{g}$$ to get: $$\begin{aligned} \dv{c_g}{t} &= \frac{V_{eg}^*}{i 2 \hbar} \Big( e^{i (\omega - \omega_0) t} + e^{- i (\omega + \omega_0) t} \Big) \: c_e \\ \dv{c_e}{t} &= \frac{V_{eg}}{i 2 \hbar} \Big( e^{i (\omega + \omega_0) t} + e^{- i (\omega - \omega_0) t} \Big) \: c_g \end{aligned}$$ At last, here we make the **rotating wave approximation**: since $$\omega$$ is assumed to be close to $$\omega_0$$, we argue that $$\omega \!+\! \omega_0$$ is so much larger than $$\omega \!-\! \omega_0$$ that those oscillations turn out negligible if the system is observed over a reasonable time interval. Specifically, since both exponentials have the same weight, the fast ($$\omega \!+\! \omega_0$$) oscillations have a tiny amplitude compared to the slow ($$\omega \!-\! \omega_0$$) ones. Furthermore, since they average out to zero over most realistic time intervals, the fast terms can be dropped, leaving: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} e^{i (\omega - \omega_0) t} + e^{- i (\omega + \omega_0) t} &\approx e^{i (\omega - \omega_0) t} \\ e^{i (\omega + \omega_0) t} + e^{- i (\omega - \omega_0) t} &\approx e^{- i (\omega - \omega_0) t} \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}$$ Such that our example set of equations can be approximated as shown below, and its analysis can continue; see [Rabi oscillation](/know/concept/rabi-oscillation/) for more: $$\begin{aligned} \dv{c_g}{t} &= \frac{V_{eg}^*}{i 2 \hbar} c_e \: e^{i (\omega - \omega_0) t} \\ \dv{c_e}{t} &= \frac{V_{eg}}{i 2 \hbar} c_g \: e^{- i (\omega - \omega_0) t} \end{aligned}$$ This approximation's name is a bit confusing: the idea is that going from the Schrödinger to the [interaction picture](/know/concept/interaction-picture/) has the effect of removing the exponentials of $$\omega_0$$ from the above equations, i.e. multiplying them by $$e^{i \omega_0 t}$$ and $$e^{- i \omega_0 t}$$ respectively, which can be regarded as a rotation. Relative to this rotation, when we split the wave $$\cos(\omega t)$$ into two exponentials, one co-rotates, and the other counter-rotates. We keep only the co-rotating waves, hence the name. The rotating wave approximation is usually used in the context of the two-level quantum system for light-matter interactions, as in the above example. However, it is not specific to that case, and it more generally refers to any approximation where fast-oscillating terms are neglected.