--- title: "Second quantization" sort_title: "Second quantization" date: 2021-02-26 categories: - Quantum mechanics - Physics layout: "concept" --- The **second quantization** is a technique to deal with quantum systems containing a large and/or variable number of identical particles. Its exact formulation depends on whether it is fermions or bosons that are being considered (see [Pauli exclusion principle](/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/)). Regardless of whether the system is fermionic or bosonic, the idea is to change basis to a set of many-particle wavefunctions known as the **Fock states**, which are specific members of a **Fock space** (a special kind of [Hilbert space](/know/concept/hilbert-space/)) with a well-defined number of particles. For a set of $$N$$ single-particle energy eigenstates $$\psi_k(x)$$ and $$N$$ identical particles $$x_k$$, the Fock states are all the wavefunctions which contain $$n$$ particles, for $$n$$ going from $$0$$ to $$N$$. In this basis, we define the **particle creation operators** and **particle annihilation operators**, which respectively add/remove a particle to/from a given state. In other words, these operators relate the Fock basis states to one another, and are very useful. The idea is to express states in such a way that the fermionic/bosonic constraints are automatically satisfied, and that the formulas look the same regardless of the number of particles. ## Fermions Fermions need to obey the Pauli exclusion principle, so each state can only contain one particle. In this case, the Fock states are given by: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} n &= 0: \qquad \Ket{0, 0, 0, ...} \\ n &= 1: \qquad \Ket{1, 0, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 1, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 0, 1, ...} \quad \cdots \\ n &= 2: \qquad \Ket{1, 1, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{1, 0, 1, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 1, 1, ...} \quad \cdots \\ &\:\:\vdots \qquad \qquad \qquad \vdots \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}$$ The notation $$\Ket{N_\alpha, N_\beta, ...}$$ is shorthand for the appropriate [Slater determinants](/know/concept/slater-determinant/). As an example, take $$\Ket{0, 1, 0, 1, 1}$$, which contains three particles $$a$$, $$b$$ and $$c$$ in states 2, 4 and 5: $$\begin{aligned} \Ket{0, 1, 0, 1, 1} = \Psi(x_a, x_b, x_c) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3!}} \det\! \begin{bmatrix} \psi_2(x_a) & \psi_4(x_a) & \psi_5(x_a) \\ \psi_2(x_b) & \psi_4(x_b) & \psi_5(x_b) \\ \psi_2(x_c) & \psi_4(x_c) & \psi_5(x_c) \end{bmatrix} \end{aligned}$$ The creation operator $$\hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger$$ and annihilation operator $$\hat{c}_\alpha$$ are defined to live up to their name: they create or destroy a particle in the state $$\psi_\alpha$$. Formally, this means: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \Ket{...0_\alpha...} &= J_\alpha \Ket{...1_\alpha...} \\ \hat{c}_\alpha \Ket{...1_\alpha...} &= J_\alpha \Ket{...0_\alpha...} \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}$$ The factor $$J_\alpha$$ is sometimes known as the **Jordan-Wigner string**, and is necessary here to enforce the fermionic antisymmetry, when creating or destroying a particle in the $$\alpha$$th state: $$\begin{aligned} J_\alpha = (-1)^{\sum_{j < \alpha} N_j} \end{aligned}$$ So, for example, when creating a particle in state 4 of $$\Ket{0, 1, 1, 0, 1}$$, we get the following: $$\begin{aligned} \hat{c}_4^\dagger \Ket{0, 1, 1, 0, 1} = (-1)^{0 + 1 + 1} \Ket{0, 1, 1, 1, 1} \end{aligned}$$ The point of the Jordan-Wigner string is that the order matters when applying the creation and annihilation operators, so, for example: $$\begin{aligned} \hat{c}_1^\dagger \hat{c}_2 \Ket{0, 1} &= \hat{c}_1^\dagger \Ket{0, 0} = \Ket{1, 0} \\ \hat{c}_2 \hat{c}_1^\dagger \Ket{0, 1} &= \hat{c}_2 \Ket{1, 1} = - \Ket{1, 0} \end{aligned}$$ In other words, $$\hat{c}_1^\dagger \hat{c}_2 = - \hat{c}_2 \hat{c}_1^\dagger$$, meaning that the anticommutator $$\{\hat{c}_2, \hat{c}_1^\dagger\} = 0$$. You can verify for yourself that the general anticommutators of these operators are given by: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} \{\hat{c}_\alpha, \hat{c}_\beta\} &= 0 \\ \{\hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger, \hat{c}_\beta^\dagger\} &= 0 \\ \{\hat{c}_\alpha, \hat{c}_\beta^\dagger\} &= \delta_{\alpha\beta} \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}$$ Each single-particle state can only contain 0 or 1 fermions, so these operators **quench** states that would violate this rule. Note that these are *scalar* zeros: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \Ket{...1_\alpha...} &= 0 \\ \hat{c}_\alpha \Ket{...0_\alpha...} &= 0 \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}$$ Finally, as has already been suggested by the notation, they are each other's adjoint: $$\begin{aligned} \matrixel{...1_\alpha...}{\hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger}{...0_\alpha...} = \matrixel{...0_\alpha...}{\hat{c}_\alpha}{...1_\alpha...}^{*} \end{aligned}$$ Let us now use these operators to define the **number operator** $$\hat{N}_\alpha$$ as follows: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \hat{N}_\alpha = \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \hat{c}_\alpha } \end{aligned}$$ Its eigenvalue is the number of particles residing in state $$\psi_\alpha$$ (look at the hats): $$\begin{aligned} \hat{N}_\alpha \Ket{... N_\alpha ...} = N_\alpha \Ket{... N_\alpha ...} \end{aligned}$$ ## Bosons Bosons do not need to obey the Pauli exclusion principle, so multiple can occupy a single state. The Fock states are therefore as follows: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} n &= 0: \qquad \Ket{0, 0, 0, ...} \\ n &= 1: \qquad \Ket{1, 0, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 1, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 0, 1, ...} \quad \cdots \\ n &= 2: \qquad \Ket{1, 1, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{1, 0, 1, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 1, 1, ...} \quad \cdots \\ &\qquad\:\,\, \qquad \Ket{2, 0, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 2, 0, ...} \quad \Ket{0, 0, 2, ...} \quad \cdots \\ &\:\:\vdots \qquad \qquad \qquad \vdots \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}$$ They must be symmetric under the exchange of two bosons. To achieve this, the Fock states are represented by Slater *permanents* rather than determinants. The boson creation and annihilation operators $$\hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger$$ and $$\hat{c}_\alpha$$ are straightforward: $$\begin{gathered} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \Ket{... N_\alpha ...} &= \sqrt{N_\alpha + 1} \: \Ket{... (N_\alpha \!+\! 1) ...} \\ \hat{c}_\alpha \Ket{... N_\alpha ...} &= \sqrt{N_\alpha} \: \Ket{... (N_\alpha \!-\! 1) ...} \end{aligned} }\end{gathered}$$ Applying the annihilation operator $$\hat{c}_\alpha$$ when there are zero particles in $$\alpha$$ quenches the state: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \hat{c}_\alpha \Ket{...0_\alpha...} = 0 } \end{aligned}$$ There is no Jordan-Wigner string, and therefore no sign change when commuting. Consequently, these operators satisfy the following commutators: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} [\hat{c}_\alpha, \hat{c}_\beta] &= 0 \\ [\hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger, \hat{c}_\beta^\dagger] &= 0 \\ [\hat{c}_\alpha, \hat{c}_\beta^\dagger] &= \delta_{\alpha\beta} \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}$$ The constant factors applied by $$\hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger$$ and $$\hat{c}_\alpha$$ ensure that $$\hat{N}_\alpha$$ keeps the same nice form: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \hat{N}_\alpha = \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \hat{c}_\alpha } \end{aligned}$$ ## Operators In the second quantization, changing between different bases of single-particle states is done in the usual way, where $$\alpha$$ and $$b$$ need not be in the same basis. Note that $$\Ket{0}$$ is the zero-particle Fock state, and $$\Ket{\alpha}$$ etc. are one-particle Fock states: $$\begin{aligned} \hat{c}_b^\dagger \Ket{0} = \Ket{b} = \sum_{\alpha} \Ket{\alpha} \inprod{\alpha}{b} = \sum_{\alpha} \inprod{\alpha}{b} \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \Ket{0} \end{aligned}$$ With this, we define the **field operators**, which create or destroy a particle at a position $$\vb{r}$$: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \hat{\Psi}^\dagger(\vb{r}) = \sum_{\alpha} \inprod{\alpha}{\vb{r}} \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \qquad \qquad \hat{\Psi}(\vb{r}) = \sum_{\alpha} \inprod{\vb{r}}{\alpha} \hat{c}_\alpha } \end{aligned}$$ By the same basis-changing principle, any single-particle (non-interacting) operator $$\hat{V}$$ can be translated to its second-quantized $$N$$-particle version as follows: $$\begin{aligned} \hat{V} &= \sum_{\alpha, \beta} \ket{\alpha} \matrixel{\alpha}{\hat{V}}{\beta} \bra{\beta} = \sum_{\alpha, \beta} \ket{\hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger 0} \matrixel{\alpha}{\hat{V}}{\beta} \bra{\hat{c}_\beta^\dagger 0} \end{aligned}$$ We take out the creation operators, which allows us to generalize to multi-particle states: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \hat{V} = \sum_{\alpha, \beta} \matrixel{\alpha}{\hat{V}}{\beta} \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \hat{c}_\beta } \end{aligned}$$ Where the matrix element $$\matrixel{\alpha}{\hat{V}}{\beta}$$ is to be evaluated in the normal way: $$\begin{aligned} \matrixel{\alpha}{\hat{V}}{\beta} = \int \psi_\alpha^*(\vb{r}) \: \hat{V}(\vb{r}) \: \psi_\beta(\vb{r}) \dd{\vb{r}} \end{aligned}$$ In the same way, a two-particle interaction operator $$\hat{W}$$ can be rewritten in the form below. Note the ordering of the operators' subscripts: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \hat{W} = \sum_{\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta} W_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta} \: \hat{c}_\alpha^\dagger \hat{c}_\beta^\dagger \hat{c}_\delta \hat{c}_\gamma } \end{aligned}$$ Where the constant $$W_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta}$$ is defined from the single-particle wavefunctions like so: $$\begin{aligned} W_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta} \equiv \iint \psi_\alpha^*(\vb{r}_1) \: \psi_\beta^*(\vb{r}_2) \: W(\vb{r}_1, \vb{r}_2) \: \psi_\gamma(\vb{r}_1) \: \psi_\delta(\vb{r}_2) \dd{\vb{r}_1} \dd{\vb{r}_2} \end{aligned}$$ ## References 1. L.E. Ballentine, *Quantum mechanics: a modern development*, 2nd edition, World Scientific.