From 6fb3b28a2ce91b8f12683692cbe32d9a4d35fc9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Prefetch Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 10:46:28 +0100 Subject: Add "Slater determinant" + improvements to knowledge base --- .../concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/source.md | 10 ++--- latex/know/concept/probability-current/source.md | 2 +- latex/know/concept/slater-determinant/source.md | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../time-independent-perturbation-theory/source.md | 2 +- 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 latex/know/concept/slater-determinant/source.md (limited to 'latex/know/concept') diff --git a/latex/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/source.md b/latex/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/source.md index d1c2149..f95541f 100644 --- a/latex/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/source.md +++ b/latex/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/source.md @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ # Pauli exclusion principle -In quantum mechanics, the **Pauli exclusion principle** is a theorem that -has profound consequences for how the world works. +In quantum mechanics, the **Pauli exclusion principle** is a theorem with +profound consequences for how the world works. Suppose we have a composite state $\ket*{x_1}\ket*{x_2} = \ket*{x_1} \otimes \ket*{x_2}$, where the two @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ $$\begin{aligned} As it turns out, in nature, each class of particle has a single associated permutation eigenvalue $\lambda$, or in other words: whether -$\lambda$ is $-1$ or $1$ depends on the species of particle that $x_1$ -and $x_2$ represent. Particles with $\lambda = -1$ are called +$\lambda$ is $-1$ or $1$ depends on the type of particle that $x_1$ +and $x_2$ are. Particles with $\lambda = -1$ are called **fermions**, and those with $\lambda = 1$ are known as **bosons**. We define $\hat{P}_f$ with $\lambda = -1$ and $\hat{P}_b$ with $\lambda = 1$, such that: @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned} = 0 \end{aligned}$$ -At last, this is the Pauli exclusion principle: **fermions may never +And this is the Pauli exclusion principle: **fermions may never occupy the same quantum state**. One of the many notable consequences of this is that the shells of atoms only fit a limited number of electrons (which are fermions), since each must have a different quantum number. diff --git a/latex/know/concept/probability-current/source.md b/latex/know/concept/probability-current/source.md index bb84121..7c29111 100644 --- a/latex/know/concept/probability-current/source.md +++ b/latex/know/concept/probability-current/source.md @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned} = - \int_{V} \nabla \cdot \vec{J} \dd[3]{\vec{r}} \end{aligned}$$ -By removing the integrals, we thus arrive at the *continuity equation* +By removing the integrals, we thus arrive at the **continuity equation** for $\vec{J}$: $$\begin{aligned} diff --git a/latex/know/concept/slater-determinant/source.md b/latex/know/concept/slater-determinant/source.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5d13c56 --- /dev/null +++ b/latex/know/concept/slater-determinant/source.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +% Slater determinant + + +# Slater determinant + +In quantum mechanics, the **Slater determinant** is a trick to create an +antisymmetric wave function for a system of $N$ fermions. + +Given an orthogonal set of individual states $\psi_n(x)$, we write +$\psi_n(x_n)$ to say that particle $x_n$ is in state $\psi_n$. Now the +goal is to find an expression for an overall many-particle wave +function $\Psi(x_1, ..., x_N)$ that satisfies the +[Pauli exclusion principle](/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/). +Enter the Slater determinant: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \boxed{ + \Psi(x_1, ..., x_N) + = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N!}} \det\! + \begin{bmatrix} + \psi_1(x_1) & \cdots & \psi_N(x_1) \\ + \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ + \psi_1(x_N) & \cdots & \psi_N(x_N) + \end{bmatrix} + }\end{aligned}$$ + +Swapping the state of two particles corresponds to exchanging two rows +in the matrix, which flips the sign of the determinant. Similarly, +exchanging two columns means swapping two states, which also results in +a sign change. Finally, putting two particles into the same state makes +$\Psi$ vanish. + +Note that not all valid many-particle fermionic wave functions can be +written as a single Slater determinant; a linear combination of multiple +may be needed. Nevertheless, an appropriate choice of the input set +$\psi_n(x)$ can optimize how well a single determinant approximates a +given $\Psi$. + +In fact, there exists a similar trick for bosons, where the goal is to +create a symmetric wave function which allows multiple particles to +occupy the same state. In this case, one needs to take the **Slater +permanent** of the same matrix, which is simply the determinant, but with +all minuses replaced by pluses. diff --git a/latex/know/concept/time-independent-perturbation-theory/source.md b/latex/know/concept/time-independent-perturbation-theory/source.md index 48504f4..d2b83e2 100644 --- a/latex/know/concept/time-independent-perturbation-theory/source.md +++ b/latex/know/concept/time-independent-perturbation-theory/source.md @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ The trick is to find a Hermitian operator $\hat{L}$ (usually using symmetries of the system) which commutes with both $\hat{H}_0$ and $\hat{H}_1$: $$\begin{aligned} - \comm*{\hat{L}}{\hat{H}_0} = \comm{\hat{L}}{\hat{H}_1} = 0 + \comm*{\hat{L}}{\hat{H}_0} = \comm*{\hat{L}}{\hat{H}_1} = 0 \end{aligned}$$ So that it shares its eigenstates with $\hat{H}_0$ (and $\hat{H}_1$), -- cgit v1.2.3