From a121b6e4affdf4e4ad26d179fbf2f6b8c6070b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Prefetch Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:06:00 +0100 Subject: Add "Pauli exclusion principle" --- .../concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/index.html | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+) create mode 100644 static/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/index.html (limited to 'static') diff --git a/static/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/index.html b/static/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/index.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..74a0954 --- /dev/null +++ b/static/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/index.html @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + + + + + + Prefetch | Pauli exclusion principle + + + + + + + +
+

Pauli exclusion principle

+

In quantum mechanics, the Pauli exclusion principle is a theorem that has profound consequences for how the world works.

+

Suppose we have a composite state \(\ket*{x_1}\!\ket*{x_2} = \ket*{x_1} \otimes \ket*{x_2}\), where the two identical particles \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) each have the same two allowed states \(a\) and \(b\). We then define the permutation operator \(\hat{P}\) as follows:

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \hat{P} \ket{a}\!\ket{b} = \ket{b}\!\ket{a} +\end{aligned}\]

+

That is, it swaps the states of the particles. Obviously, swapping the states twice simply gives the original configuration again, so:

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \hat{P}^2 \ket{a}\!\ket{b} = \ket{a}\!\ket{b} +\end{aligned}\]

+

Therefore, \(\ket{a}\!\ket{b}\) is an eigenvector of \(\hat{P}^2\) with eigenvalue \(1\). Since \([\hat{P}, \hat{P}^2] = 0\), \(\ket{a}\!\ket{b}\) must also be an eigenket of \(\hat{P}\) with eigenvalue \(\lambda\), satisfying \(\lambda^2 = 1\), so we know that \(\lambda = 1\) or \(\lambda = -1\).

+

As it turns out, in nature, each class of particle has a single associated permutation eigenvalue \(\lambda\), or in other words: whether \(\lambda\) is \(-1\) or \(1\) depends on the species of particle that \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) represent. Particles with \(\lambda = -1\) are called fermions, and those with \(\lambda = 1\) are known as bosons. We define \(\hat{P}_f\) with \(\lambda = -1\) and \(\hat{P}_b\) with \(\lambda = 1\), such that:

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \hat{P}_f \ket{a}\!\ket{b} = \ket{b}\!\ket{a} = - \ket{a}\!\ket{b} + \qquad + \hat{P}_b \ket{a}\!\ket{b} = \ket{b}\!\ket{a} = \ket{a}\!\ket{b} +\end{aligned}\]

+

Another fundamental fact of nature is that identical particles cannot be distinguished by any observation. Therefore it is impossible to tell apart \(\ket{a}\!\ket{b}\) and the permuted state \(\ket{b}\!\ket{a}\), regardless of the eigenvalue \(\lambda\). There is no physical difference!

+

But this does not mean that \(\hat{P}\) is useless: despite not having any observable effect, the resulting difference between fermions and bosons is absolutely fundamental. Consider the following superposition state, where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are unknown:

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \ket{\Psi(a, b)} + = \alpha \ket{a}\!\ket{b} + \beta \ket{b}\!\ket{a} +\end{aligned}\]

+

When we apply \(\hat{P}\), we can “choose” between two “intepretations” of its action, both shown below. Obviously, since the left-hand sides are equal, the right-hand sides must be equal too:

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \hat{P} \ket{\Psi(a, b)} + &= \lambda \alpha \ket{a}\!\ket{b} + \lambda \beta \ket{b}\!\ket{a} + \\ + \hat{P} \ket{\Psi(a, b)} + = \alpha \ket{b}\!\ket{a} + \beta \ket{a}\!\ket{b} +\end{aligned}\]

+

This gives us the equations \(\lambda \alpha = \beta\) and \(\lambda \beta = \alpha\). In fact, just from this we could have deduced that \(\lambda\) can be either \(-1\) or \(1\). In any case, for bosons (\(\lambda = 1\)), we thus find that \(\alpha = \beta\):

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \ket{\Psi(a, b)}_b = C \big( \ket{a}\!\ket{b} + \ket{b}\!\ket{a} \!\big) +\end{aligned}\]

+

Where \(C\) is a normalization constant. As expected, this state is symmetric: switching \(a\) and \(b\) gives the same result. Meanwhile, for fermions (\(\lambda = -1\)), we find that \(\alpha = -\beta\):

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \ket{\Psi(a, b)}_f = C \big( \ket{a}\!\ket{b} - \ket{b}\!\ket{a} \!\big) +\end{aligned}\]

+

This state called antisymmetric under exchange: switching \(a\) and \(b\) causes a sign change, as we would expect for fermions.

+

Now, what if the particles \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are in the same state \(a\)? For bosons, we just need to update the normalization constant \(C\):

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \ket{\Psi(a, a)}_b + = C \ket{a}\!\ket{a} +\end{aligned}\]

+

However, for fermions, the state is unnormalizable and thus unphysical:

+

\[\begin{aligned} + \ket{\Psi(a, a)}_f + = C \big( \ket{a}\!\ket{a} - \ket{a}\!\ket{a} \!\big) + = 0 +\end{aligned}\]

+

At last, this is the Pauli exclusion principle: fermions may never occupy the same quantum state. One of the many notable consequences of this is that the shells of an atom only fit a limited number of electrons, since each must have a different quantum number.

+
+© "Prefetch". Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. + + -- cgit v1.2.3