Categories: Quantum mechanics.

Bloch’s theorem

In quantum mechanics, Bloch’s theorem states that, given a potential \(V(\vec{r})\) which is periodic on a lattice, i.e. \(V(\vec{r}) = V(\vec{r} + \vec{a})\) for a primitive lattice vector \(\vec{a}\), then it follows that the solutions \(\psi(\vec{r})\) to the time-independent Schrödinger equation take the following form, where the function \(u(\vec{r})\) is periodic on the same lattice, i.e. \(u(\vec{r}) = u(\vec{r} + \vec{a})\):

\[ \begin{aligned} \boxed{ \psi(\vec{r}) = u(\vec{r}) e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}} } \end{aligned} \]

In other words, in a periodic potential, the solutions are simply plane waves with a periodic modulation, known as Bloch functions or Bloch states.

This is suprisingly easy to prove: if the Hamiltonian \(\hat{H}\) is lattice-periodic, then both \(\psi(\vec{r})\) and \(\psi(\vec{r} + \vec{a})\) are eigenstates with the same energy:

\[ \begin{aligned} \hat{H} \psi(\vec{r}) = E \psi(\vec{r}) \qquad \hat{H} \psi(\vec{r} + \vec{a}) = E \psi(\vec{r} + \vec{a}) \end{aligned} \]

Now define the unitary translation operator \(\hat{T}(\vec{a})\) such that \(\psi(\vec{r} + \vec{a}) = \hat{T}(\vec{a}) \psi(\vec{r})\). From the previous equation, we then know that:

\[ \begin{aligned} \hat{H} \hat{T}(\vec{a}) \psi(\vec{r}) = E \hat{T}(\vec{a}) \psi(\vec{r}) = \hat{T}(\vec{a}) \big(E \psi(\vec{r})\big) = \hat{T}(\vec{a}) \hat{H} \psi(\vec{r}) \end{aligned} \]

In other words, if \(\hat{H}\) is lattice-periodic, then it will commute with \(\hat{T}(\vec{a})\), i.e. \([\hat{H}, \hat{T}(\vec{a})] = 0\). Consequently, \(\hat{H}\) and \(\hat{T}(\vec{a})\) must share eigenstates \(\psi(\vec{r})\):

\[ \begin{aligned} \hat{H} \:\psi(\vec{r}) = E \:\psi(\vec{r}) \qquad \hat{T}(\vec{a}) \:\psi(\vec{r}) = \tau \:\psi(\vec{r}) \end{aligned} \]

Since \(\hat{T}\) is unitary, its eigenvalues \(\tau\) must have the form \(e^{i \theta}\), with \(\theta\) real. Therefore a translation by \(\vec{a}\) causes a phase shift, for some vector \(\vec{k}\):

\[ \begin{aligned} \psi(\vec{r} + \vec{a}) = \hat{T}(\vec{a}) \:\psi(\vec{r}) = e^{i \theta} \:\psi(\vec{r}) = e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{a}} \:\psi(\vec{r}) \end{aligned} \]

Let us now define the following function, keeping our arbitrary choice of \(\vec{k}\):

\[ \begin{aligned} u(\vec{r}) = e^{- i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}} \:\psi(\vec{r}) \end{aligned} \]

As it turns out, this function is guaranteed to be lattice-periodic for any \(\vec{k}\):

\[ \begin{aligned} u(\vec{r} + \vec{a}) &= e^{- i \vec{k} \cdot (\vec{r} + \vec{a})} \:\psi(\vec{r} + \vec{a}) \\ &= e^{- i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}} e^{- i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{a}} e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{a}} \:\psi(\vec{r}) \\ &= e^{- i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}} \:\psi(\vec{r}) \\ &= u(\vec{r}) \end{aligned} \]

Then Bloch’s theorem follows from isolating the definition of \(u(\vec{r})\) for \(\psi(\vec{r})\).


© "Prefetch". Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
uses