Categories: Optics, Physics.

Coupled mode theory

Given an optical resonator (e.g. a photonic crystal cavity), consider one of its quasinormal modes with frequency ω0\omega_0 and decay rate 1/τ01 / \tau_0 in isolation. Its complex amplitude AA then obeys:

dAdt=( ⁣− ⁣iω0−1τ0)A\begin{aligned} \dv{A}{t} &= \bigg( \!-\! i \omega_0 - \frac{1}{\tau_0} \bigg) A \end{aligned}

We choose to normalize AA so that ∣A(t)∣2|A(t)|^2 is the total energy inside the resonator at time tt.

Suppose that NN waveguides are now “connected” to this resonator, meaning that the resonator mode AA and the outgoing waveguide mode SℓoutS_\ell^\mathrm{out} overlap sufficiently for AA to leak into SℓoutS_\ell^\mathrm{out} at a rate 1/τℓ1 / \tau_\ell. Conversely, the incoming mode SℓinS_\ell^\mathrm{in} brings energy to AA. Therefore, we can write up the following general set of equations:

dAdt=( ⁣− ⁣iω0−1τ0)A−∑ℓ=1N1τℓA+∑ℓ=1NαℓSℓinSℓout=βℓSℓin+γℓA\begin{aligned} \dv{A}{t} &= \bigg( \!-\! i \omega_0 - \frac{1}{\tau_0} \bigg) A - \sum_{\ell = 1}^N \frac{1}{\tau_\ell} A + \sum_{\ell = 1}^N \alpha_\ell S_\ell^\mathrm{in} \\ S_\ell^\mathrm{out} &= \beta_\ell S_\ell^\mathrm{in} + \gamma_\ell A \end{aligned}

Where αℓ\alpha_\ell and γℓ\gamma_\ell are unknown coupling constants, and βℓ\beta_\ell represents reflection. We normalize SℓinS_\ell^\mathrm{in} so that ∣Sℓin(t)∣2|S_\ell^\mathrm{in}(t)|^2 is the power flowing towards AA at time tt, and likewise for SℓoutS_\ell^\mathrm{out}.

Note that we have made a subtle approximation here: by adding new damping mechanisms, we are in fact modifying ω0\omega_0; see the harmonic oscillator for a demonstration. However, the frequency shift is second-order in the decay rate, so by assuming that all τℓ\tau_\ell are large, we only need to keep the first-order terms, as we did. This is called weak coupling.

If we also assume that τ0\tau_0 is large (its effect is already included in ω0\omega_0), then we can treat the decay mechanisms separately: to analyze the decay into a certain waveguide ℓ\ell, it is first-order accurate to neglect all other waveguides and τ0\tau_0:

dAdt≈( ⁣− ⁣iω0−1τℓ)A+∑ℓ′=1NαℓSℓ′in\begin{aligned} \dv{A}{t} \approx \bigg( \!-\! i \omega_0 - \frac{1}{\tau_\ell} \bigg) A + \sum_{\ell' = 1}^N \alpha_\ell S_{\ell'}^\mathrm{in} \end{aligned}

To determine γℓ\gamma_\ell, we use energy conservation. If all Sℓ′in=0S_{\ell'}^\mathrm{in} = 0, then the energy in AA decays as:

d∣A∣2dt=dAdtA∗+AdA∗dt=( ⁣− ⁣iω0−1τℓ)∣A∣2+(iω0−1τℓ)∣A∣2=−2τℓ∣A∣2\begin{aligned} \dv{|A|^2}{t} &= \dv{A}{t} A^* + A \dv{A^*}{t} \\ &= \bigg( \!-\! i \omega_0 - \frac{1}{\tau_\ell} \bigg) |A|^2 + \bigg( i \omega_0 - \frac{1}{\tau_\ell} \bigg) |A|^2 \\ &= - \frac{2}{\tau_\ell} |A|^2 \end{aligned}

Since all other mechanisms are neglected, all this energy must go into SℓoutS_\ell^\mathrm{out}, meaning:

∣Sℓout∣2=−d∣A∣2dt=2τℓ∣A∣2\begin{aligned} |S_\ell^\mathrm{out}|^2 = - \dv{|A|^2}{t} = \frac{2}{\tau_\ell} |A|^2 \end{aligned}

Taking the square root, we clearly see that ∣γℓ∣=2/τℓ|\gamma_\ell| = \sqrt{2 / \tau_\ell}. Because the phase of SℓoutS_\ell^\mathrm{out} is arbitrarily defined, γℓ\gamma_\ell need not be complex, so we choose γℓ=2/τℓ\gamma_\ell = \sqrt{2 / \tau_\ell}.

Next, to find αℓ\alpha_\ell, we exploit the time-reversal symmetry of Maxwell’s equations, which govern the light in the resonator and the waveguides. In the above calculation of γℓ\gamma_\ell, AA evolved as follows, with the lost energy ending up in SℓoutS_\ell^\mathrm{out}:

A(t)=Ae−iω0t−t/τℓ\begin{aligned} A(t) = A e^{-i \omega_0 t - t / \tau_\ell} \end{aligned}

After reversing time, AA evolves like so, where we have taken the complex conjugate to preserve the meanings of the symbols AA, SℓoutS_\ell^\mathrm{out}, and SℓinS_\ell^\mathrm{in}:

A(t)=Ae−iω0t+t/τℓ\begin{aligned} A(t) = A e^{-i \omega_0 t + t / \tau_\ell} \end{aligned}

We insert this expression for A(t)A(t) into its original differential equation, yielding:

dAdt=( ⁣− ⁣iω0+1τℓ)A=( ⁣− ⁣iω0−1τℓ)A+αℓSℓin\begin{aligned} \dv{A}{t} = \bigg( \!-\! i \omega_0 + \frac{1}{\tau_\ell} \bigg) A = \bigg( \!-\! i \omega_0 - \frac{1}{\tau_\ell} \bigg) A + \alpha_\ell S_\ell^\mathrm{in} \end{aligned}

Isolating this for AA leads us to the following power balance equation:

A=αℓτℓ2Sℓin  ⟹  ∣αℓ∣2∣Sℓin∣2=4τℓ2∣A∣2\begin{aligned} A = \frac{\alpha_\ell \tau_\ell}{2} S_\ell^\mathrm{in} \qquad \implies \qquad |\alpha_\ell|^2 |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 = \frac{4}{\tau_\ell^2} |A|^2 \end{aligned}

But thanks to energy conservation, all power delivered by SℓinS_\ell^\mathrm{in} ends up in AA, so we know:

∣Sℓin∣2=d∣A∣2dt=2τℓ∣A∣2\begin{aligned} |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 = \dv{|A|^2}{t} = \frac{2}{\tau_\ell} |A|^2 \end{aligned}

To reconcile the two equations above, we need ∣αℓ∣=2/τℓ|\alpha_\ell| = \sqrt{2 / \tau_\ell}. Discarding the phase thanks to our choice of γℓ\gamma_\ell, we conclude that αℓ=2/τℓ=γℓ\alpha_\ell = \sqrt{2 / \tau_\ell} = \gamma_\ell.

Finally, βℓ\beta_\ell can also be determined using energy conservation. Again using our weak coupling assumption, if energy is only entering and leaving AA through waveguide ℓ\ell, we have:

∣Sℓin∣2−∣Sℓout∣2=d∣A∣2dt\begin{aligned} |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 - |S_\ell^\mathrm{out}|^2 = \dv{|A|^2}{t} \end{aligned}

Meanwhile, using the differential equation for AA, we find the following relation:

d∣A∣2dt=dAdtA∗+AdA∗dt=−2τℓ∣A∣2+αℓ(SℓinA∗+(Sℓin)∗A)\begin{aligned} \dv{|A|^2}{t} &= \dv{A}{t} A^* + A \dv{A^*}{t} \\ &= - \frac{2}{\tau_\ell} |A|^2 + \alpha_\ell \Big( S_\ell^\mathrm{in} A^* + (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* A \Big) \end{aligned}

By isolating both of the above relations for d∣A∣2/dt\idv{|A|^2}{t} and equating them, we arrive at:

∣Sℓin∣2−∣Sℓout∣2=−2τℓ∣A∣2+αℓ(SℓinA∗+(Sℓin)∗A)\begin{aligned} |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 - |S_\ell^\mathrm{out}|^2 &= - \frac{2}{\tau_\ell} |A|^2 + \alpha_\ell \Big( S_\ell^\mathrm{in} A^* + (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* A \Big) \end{aligned}

We insert the definition of γℓ\gamma_\ell and βℓ\beta_\ell, namely γℓA=Sℓout−βℓSℓin\gamma_\ell A = S_\ell^\mathrm{out} - \beta_\ell S_\ell^\mathrm{in}, and use αℓ=γℓ\alpha_\ell = \gamma_\ell:

∣Sℓin∣2−∣Sℓout∣2=−(Sℓout−βℓSℓin)((Sℓout)∗−βℓ∗(Sℓin)∗)  +Sℓin((Sℓout)∗−βℓ∗(Sℓin)∗)+(Sℓin)∗(Sℓout−βℓSℓin)=−∣βℓ∣2∣Sℓin∣2−∣Sℓout∣2+βℓSℓin(Sℓout)∗+βℓ∗(Sℓin)∗Sℓout  +Sℓin(Sℓout)∗−βℓ∗∣Sℓin∣2+(Sℓin)∗Sℓout−βℓ∣Sℓin∣2=−(∣βℓ∣2+βℓ+βℓ∗)∣Sℓin∣2−∣Sℓout∣2  +(1−βℓ)Sℓin(Sℓout)∗+(1−βℓ∗)(Sℓin)∗Sℓout\begin{aligned} |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 - |S_\ell^\mathrm{out}|^2 &= - \Big( S_\ell^\mathrm{out} - \beta_\ell S_\ell^\mathrm{in} \Big) \Big( (S_\ell^\mathrm{out})^* - \beta_\ell^* (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* \Big) \\ &\quad\; + S_\ell^\mathrm{in} \Big( (S_\ell^\mathrm{out})^* - \beta_\ell^* (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* \Big) + (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* \Big( S_\ell^\mathrm{out} - \beta_\ell S_\ell^\mathrm{in} \Big) \\ &= - |\beta_\ell|^2 |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 - |S_\ell^\mathrm{out}|^2 + \beta_\ell S_\ell^\mathrm{in} (S_\ell^\mathrm{out})^* + \beta_\ell^* (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* S_\ell^\mathrm{out} \\ &\quad\; + S_\ell^\mathrm{in} (S_\ell^\mathrm{out})^* - \beta_\ell^* |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 + (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* S_\ell^\mathrm{out} - \beta_\ell |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 \\ &= - (|\beta_\ell|^2 + \beta_\ell + \beta_\ell^*) |S_\ell^\mathrm{in}|^2 - |S_\ell^\mathrm{out}|^2 \\ &\quad\; + (1 - \beta_\ell) S_\ell^\mathrm{in} (S_\ell^\mathrm{out})^* + (1 - \beta_\ell^*) (S_\ell^\mathrm{in})^* S_\ell^\mathrm{out} \end{aligned}

This equation is only satisfied if βℓ=−1\beta_\ell = -1. Combined with αℓ=γℓ=2/τℓ\alpha_\ell = \gamma_\ell = \sqrt{2 / \tau_\ell}, the coupled-mode equations take the following form:

dAdt=( ⁣− ⁣iω0−1τ0)A−∑ℓ=1N1τℓA+∑ℓ=1N2τℓSℓinSℓout=−Sℓin+2τℓA\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \begin{aligned} \dv{A}{t} &= \bigg( \!-\! i \omega_0 - \frac{1}{\tau_0} \bigg) A - \sum_{\ell = 1}^N \frac{1}{\tau_\ell} A + \sum_{\ell = 1}^N \sqrt{\frac{2}{\tau_\ell}} S_\ell^\mathrm{in} \\ S_\ell^\mathrm{out} &= - S_\ell^\mathrm{in} + \sqrt{\frac{2}{\tau_\ell}} A \end{aligned} } \end{aligned}

By connecting multiple resonators with waveguides, optical networks can be created, whose dynamics are described by these equations.

The coupled-mode equations are extremely general, since we have only used weak coupling, conservation of energy, and time-reversal symmetry. Even if the decay rates are quite large, coupled mode theory still tends to give qualitatively correct answers.

References

  1. H.A. Haus, Waves and fields in optoelectronics, 1984, Prentice-Hall.
  2. J.D. Joannopoulos, S.G. Johnson, J.N. Winn, R.D. Meade, Photonic crystals: molding the flow of light, 2nd edition, Princeton.