Categories:
Physics,
Quantum mechanics.
Ehrenfest’s theorem
In quantum mechanics, Ehrenfest’s theorem gives a general expression
for the time evolution of an observable’s expectation value ⟨L^⟩.
Recall the time-dependent Schrödinger equation,
where prime denotes differentiation with respect to time t:
∣ψ′⟩=iℏ1H^∣ψ⟩⟨ψ′∣=−iℏ1⟨ψ∣H^
Given an observable operator L^ and a state ∣ψ⟩,
the t-derivative of the expectation value ⟨L^⟩ is as follows
(due to the product rule of differentiation):
dtd⟨L^⟩=⟨ψ∣L^∣ψ′⟩+⟨ψ′∣L^∣ψ⟩+⟨ψ∣L^′∣ψ⟩=iℏ1⟨ψ∣L^H^∣ψ⟩−iℏ1⟨ψ∣H^L^∣ψ⟩+⟨dtdL^⟩
The first two terms on the right can be rewritten using a commutator,
yielding the general form of Ehrenfest’s theorem:
dtd⟨L^⟩=iℏ1⟨[L^,H^]⟩+⟨dtdL^⟩
In practice, since most operators are time-independent, the last term often vanishes.
Note that this relation is trivial to prove
in the Heisenberg picture,
by wrapping all terms in ⟨ψ∣ and ∣ψ⟩.
Two observables of particular interest
are position X^ and momentum P^.
Applying the theorem to X^ yields the following,
using H^=P^2/(2m)+V(X^)
and a few basic properties of commutators:
dtd⟨X^⟩=iℏ1⟨[X^,H^]⟩=2iℏm1⟨[X^,P^2]+2m[X^,V(X^)]⟩=2iℏm1⟨P^[X^,P^]+[X^,P^]P^⟩=2iℏm2iℏ⟨P^⟩
This is the first part of the “original” form of Ehrenfest’s theorem,
which is reminiscent of classical Newtonian mechanics:
dtd⟨X^⟩=m⟨P^⟩
Next, applying the general formula to the expected momentum ⟨P^⟩
gives us:
dtd⟨P^⟩=iℏ1⟨[P^,H^]⟩=2iℏm1⟨[P^,P^2]+2m[P^,V(X^)]⟩=iℏ1⟨[P^,V(X^)]⟩
To evaluate the commutator,
we go to the X^-basis and use a test function f(x):
[−iℏdxd,V(x)]f(x)=−iℏdxd(V(x)f(x))−V(x)(−iℏdxd)f(x)=−iℏdxdVf(x)−iℏV(x)dxdf+iℏV(x)dxdf=−iℏdxdVf(x)
By inserting this result back into the previous equation,
we find the second part of Ehrenfest’s original theorem,
which is again reminiscent Newtonian mechanics:
dtd⟨P^⟩=−⟨∂X^∂V⟩
There is an important consequence of Ehrenfest’s original theorems
for the symbolic derivatives of the Hamiltonian H^
with respect to X^ and P^:
⟨∂P^∂H^⟩=dtd⟨X^⟩−⟨∂X^∂H^⟩=dtd⟨P^⟩
These are easy to prove yourself,
and are analogous to Hamilton’s canonical equations.