Categories: Physics, Quantum mechanics.

Fermi gas

A Fermi gas is a system of many fermions that do not interact directly, only indirectly through the Pauli exclusion principle, and hence obey Fermi-Dirac statistics.

There are several real-life systems for which this model is relevant, but most notably it serves as the foundation of the quantum-mechanical study of electrons (or electron holes) in materials. Obviously, electrons do interact strongly via the Coulomb force, but it is nevertheless a useful starting point to neglect that fact, and to then add the interactions later (see e.g. jellium).

Consider a collection of infinitely many non-interacting fermions. For mathematical convenience, we restrict ourselves to a cube with side LL, and impose periodic boundary conditions. Then, at the end of our calculation, we should in theory take the limit L→∞L \to \infty to recover the “true” system.

In the absence of any potentials, all the fermions’ wavefunctions are simply plane waves ∣ψk⟩\ket{\psi_\vb{k}} with wavevector k\vb{k}. Due to the cube’s finite size and its periodic boundary conditions, those waves have a discrete spectrum of allowed wavevectors k\vb{k}, meaning that each particle’s wavefunction ∣ψk⟩\ket{\psi_\vb{k}} is as follows in r\vb{r}-space (modulo a constant phase):

ψk(r)=1L3exp⁡(ik⋅r)k=2πL(nx,ny,nz)\begin{aligned} \psi_{\vb{k}}(\vb{r}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{L^3}} \exp(i \vb{k} \cdot \vb{r}) \qquad \qquad \vb{k} = \frac{2 \pi}{L} (n_x, n_y, n_z) \end{aligned}

Where nx,ny,nz∈Zn_x, n_y, n_z \in \mathbb{Z}. This is a discrete (but infinite) set of independent orbitals, so it is natural to use the second quantization’s operators c^†\hat{c}^\dagger and c^\hat{c} in our analysis.

Let the temperature T=0T = 0, then the NN fermions inside our cube fill the NN lowest-energy orbitals. The resulting NN-particle ground state is known as the Fermi sea or Fermi sphere ∣FS⟩\ket{\mathrm{FS}}, and can be written as follows, where SS is the spin degeneracy, i.e. for each k\vb{k} there are SS orbitals with the same energy but different spin ss (for most relevant fermions S=2S = 2):

∣FS⟩=∏s∏j=1N/Sc^s,kj†∣0⟩\begin{aligned} \ket{\mathrm{FS}} = \prod_{s} \prod_{j = 1}^{N/S} \hat{c}_{s,\vb{k}_j}^\dagger \ket{0} \end{aligned}

The energy and wavenumber ∣k∣|\vb{k}| of the highest filled orbital are called the Fermi energy εF\varepsilon_F and Fermi wavenumber kFk_F, and obey the expected kinetic energy relation:

εF=ℏ22mkF2\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \varepsilon_F = \frac{\hbar^2}{2 m} k_F^2 } \end{aligned}

The Fermi sphere can be visualized in k\vb{k}-space as a sphere with radius kFk_F. Because k\vb{k} is discrete, the sphere’s surface is not smooth, but in the limit L→∞L \to \infty that “roughness” disappears.

Now, we would like a relation between the system’s parameters, e.g. NN and LL, and the resulting values of εF\varepsilon_F or kFk_F. The total number NN of fermions in our cube is given by:

N=∑s∑k⟨FS∣c^s,k†c^s,k∣FS⟩=∑sL3(2π)3∫−∞∞⟨FS∣c^s,k†c^s,k∣FS⟩dk\begin{aligned} N = \sum_{s} \sum_{\vb{k}} \matrixel{\mathrm{FS}}{\hat{c}_{s,\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{s,\vb{k}}}{\mathrm{FS}} = \sum_{s} \frac{L^3}{(2 \pi)^3} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \matrixel{\mathrm{FS}}{\hat{c}_{s,\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{s,\vb{k}}}{\mathrm{FS}} \dd{\vb{k}} \end{aligned}

Where the periodic boundary conditions have enabled us to convert the sum over k\vb{k} to an integral. For T=0T = 0, the matrix element ⟨FS∣c^s,k†c^s,k∣FS⟩\matrixel{\mathrm{FS}}{\hat{c}_{s,\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{s,\vb{k}}}{\mathrm{FS}} is either 00 or 11, depending on whether k\vb{k} is outside or inside the Fermi sphere. We can write this using a Heaviside step function:

N=∑sL3(2π)3∫−∞∞Θ(kF−∣k∣)dk=SL3(2π)3∫−∞∞Θ(kF−∣k∣)dk\begin{aligned} N = \sum_{s} \frac{L^3}{(2 \pi)^3} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Theta(k_F - |\vb{k}|) \dd{\vb{k}} = \frac{S L^3}{(2 \pi)^3} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Theta(k_F - |\vb{k}|) \dd{\vb{k}} \end{aligned}

Where we realized that spin does not matter, to replace the sum with a factor SS. To evaluate this 3D integral, we transition to spherical coordinates (∣k∣,θ,φ)(|\vb{k}|, \theta, \varphi):

N=SL38π3∫02π∫0π∫0∞Θ(kF−∣k∣)∣k∣2sin⁡(θ)d∣k∣dθdφ=SL38π34π∫0∞Θ(kF−∣k∣)∣k∣2sin⁡(θ)d∣k∣=SL32π2∫0kF∣k∣2d∣k∣=SL36π2kF3\begin{aligned} N &= \frac{S L^3}{8 \pi^3} \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^\pi \int_0^\infty \Theta(k_F - |\vb{k}|) |\vb{k}|^2 \sin(\theta) \dd{|\vb{k}|} \dd{\theta} \dd{\varphi} \\ &= \frac{S L^3}{8 \pi^3} 4 \pi \int_0^\infty \Theta(k_F - |\vb{k}|) |\vb{k}|^2 \sin(\theta) \dd{|\vb{k}|} \\ &= \frac{S L^3}{2 \pi^2} \int_0^{k_F} |\vb{k}|^2 \dd{|\vb{k}|} \\ &= \frac{S L^3}{6 \pi^2} k_F^3 \end{aligned}

Since the particle density n=N/L3n = N / L^3, we can rearrange this result to the following relation:

kF3=6π2Sn\begin{aligned} \boxed{ k_F^3 = \frac{6 \pi^2}{S} n } \qquad \end{aligned}

Consequently, the Fermi energy εF\varepsilon_F and the corresponding orbital’s velocity vF=ℏkF/mv_F = \hbar k_F / m can be expressed as a function of the density nn:

εF=ℏ22m(6π2S)2/3n2/3vF=ℏm(6π2S)1/3n1/3\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \varepsilon_F = \frac{\hbar^2}{2 m} \bigg( \frac{6 \pi^2}{S} \bigg)^{2/3} n^{2/3} } \qquad \qquad \boxed{ v_F = \frac{\hbar}{m} \bigg( \frac{6 \pi^2}{S} \bigg)^{1/3} n^{1/3} } \end{aligned}

This is an important result, especially for electrons in metals. We know the electron density nn for many conductors, and then these relations tell us that vF≪cv_F \ll c, and that the “Fermi temperature” TF=εF/kBT_F = \varepsilon_F / k_B is very large (e.g. TF≈8⋅104 KT_F \approx 8 \cdot 10^4 \: \mathrm{K} for copper). This justifies our implicit assumptions that relativity and thermal fluctuations are negligible under normal circumstances.

We now have an expression for εF\varepsilon_F as a function of nn, which we can control by adding or removing fermions from the system. But it is also useful to isolate this relation for nn instead:

n=S6π2(2mℏ2)3/2εF3/2\begin{aligned} n &= \frac{S}{6 \pi^2} \bigg( \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \bigg)^{3/2} \varepsilon_F^{3/2} \end{aligned}

And from this we obtain the density of states gg per unit volume of a 3D Fermi gas:

g(εF)=dndεF=S4π2(2mℏ2)3/2εF1/2\begin{aligned} \boxed{ g(\varepsilon_F) = \dv{n}{\varepsilon_F} = \frac{S}{4 \pi^2} \bigg( \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \bigg)^{3/2} \varepsilon_F^{1/2} } \end{aligned}

Now, εF\varepsilon_F is the highest energy of a single fermion, but what about the total NN-particle energy EE of the cube? This is easy to calculate using the density of states:

EL3=∫0εFε g(ε)dε=S4π2(2mℏ2)3/2∫0εFε3/2dε=32S6π2(2mℏ2)3/2 25εF5/2\begin{aligned} \frac{E}{L^3} &= \int_0^{\varepsilon_F} \varepsilon \: g(\varepsilon) \dd{\varepsilon} \\ &= \frac{S}{4 \pi^2} \bigg( \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \bigg)^{3/2} \int_0^{\varepsilon_F} \varepsilon^{3/2} \dd{\varepsilon} \\ &= \frac{3}{2} \frac{S}{6 \pi^2} \bigg( \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \bigg)^{3/2} \: \frac{2}{5} \varepsilon_F^{5/2} \end{aligned}

Here, we recognize n(εF)n(\varepsilon_F) from earlier, leading to the following total EE per unit volume:

EL3=35nεF\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \frac{E}{L^3} = \frac{3}{5} n \varepsilon_F } \end{aligned}

This model is a strong foundation for many more advanced calculations.

References

  1. H. Bruus, K. Flensberg, Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics, 2016, Oxford.