Categories: Physics, Quantum mechanics.

Lindhard function

The Lindhard function describes how an external perturbation affects a gas of free electrons, and can be regarded as the backbone of quantum mechanical models of metals.

Derivation

Consider the following general harmonic perturbation H^1\hat{H}_1, where U(r)U(\vb{r}) is an arbitrary potential, n^(r)\hat{n}(\vb{r}) is the electron density operator, and η→0+\eta \to 0^{+} is needed to ensure convergence:

H^1,S(t)=ei(ω+iη)t∫−∞∞U(r) n^S(r)dr\begin{aligned} \hat{H}_{1,S}(t) = e^{i (\omega + i \eta) t} \int_{-\infty}^\infty U(\vb{r}) \: \hat{n}_S(\vb{r}) \dd{\vb{r}} \end{aligned}

Here, the subscript SS refers to the Schrödinger picture. The first-order effect of this perturbation on the expected density ⟨n^⟩\Expval{\hat{n}} is then given by the Kubo formula below, where the subscript II refers to the interaction picture, and the expectation ⟨⟩0\Expval{}_0 is taken with respect to the thermal equilibrium that existed before the perturbation was applied:

δ ⁣⟨n^(r,t)⟩=−iℏ∫−∞∞Θ(t−t′)⟨[n^I(r,t),H^1,I(t′)]⟩0dt′=∬−∞∞χ(r,r′;t,t′) U(r′) ei(ω+iη)t′dt′dr′\begin{aligned} \delta\!\Expval{\hat{n}(\vb{r}, t)} &= -\frac{i}{\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Theta(t - t') \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{r}, t)}{\hat{H}_{1,I}(t')}}_0 \dd{t'} \\ &= \iint_{-\infty}^\infty \chi(\vb{r}, \vb{r}'; t, t') \: U(\vb{r}') \: e^{i (\omega + i \eta) t'} \dd{t'} \dd{\vb{r}'} \end{aligned}

Where Θ\Theta is a Heaviside step function, and the response χ\chi is the density-density correlation function (i.e. a two-particle Green’s function):

χ(r,r′;t,t′)≡−iℏΘ(t−t′)⟨[n^I(r,t),n^I(r′,t′)]⟩0\begin{aligned} \chi(\vb{r}, \vb{r}'; t, t') \equiv - \frac{i}{\hbar} \Theta(t - t') \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{r}, t)}{\hat{n}_I(\vb{r}', t')}}_0 \end{aligned}

Let us assume that the unperturbed system (i.e. without UU) was spatially uniform, so that χ\chi only depends on the difference r−r′\vb{r} - \vb{r}'. We then take its Fourier transform r−r′→q\vb{r} - \vb{r}' \to \vb{q}:

χ(q;t,t′)=∫−∞∞χ(r−r′;t,t′) e−iq⋅(r−r′)dr=−iℏΘ(t ⁣− ⁣t′)(2π)2D∭−∞∞⟨[n^I(q1,t),n^I(q2,t′)]⟩0 eiq1⋅reiq2⋅r′e−iq⋅(r−r′)dq1dq2dr\begin{aligned} \chi(\vb{q}; t, t') &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty \chi(\vb{r} - \vb{r}'; t, t') \: e^{- i \vb{q} \cdot (\vb{r} - \vb{r}')} \dd{\vb{r}} \\ &= -\frac{i}{\hbar} \frac{\Theta(t \!-\! t')}{(2 \pi)^{2 D}} \iiint_{-\infty}^\infty \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_1, t)}{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_2, t')}}_0 \: e^{i \vb{q}_1 \cdot \vb{r}} e^{i \vb{q}_2 \cdot \vb{r}'} e^{- i \vb{q} \cdot (\vb{r} - \vb{r}')} \dd{\vb{q}_1} \dd{\vb{q}_2} \dd{\vb{r}} \end{aligned}

Where both n^I\hat{n}_I have been written as inverse Fourier transforms, giving a factor (2π)−D(2 \pi)^{-D} each, where DD is the number of spatial dimenions. We rearrange to get a Dirac delta function δ\delta:

χ(q;t,t′)=−iℏΘ(t ⁣− ⁣t′)(2π)2D∭⟨[n^I(q1,t),n^I(q2,t′)]⟩0 ei(q1−q)⋅rei(q2+q)⋅r′dq1dq2dr=−iℏΘ(t ⁣− ⁣t′)(2π)D∬⟨[n^I(q1,t),n^I(q2,t′)]⟩0 δ(q1 ⁣− ⁣q) ei(q2+q)⋅r′dq1dq2=−iℏΘ(t ⁣− ⁣t′)(2π)D∫⟨[n^I(q,t),n^I(q2,t′)]⟩0 ei(q2+q)⋅r′dq2\begin{aligned} \chi(\vb{q}; t, t') &= -\frac{i}{\hbar} \frac{\Theta(t \!-\! t')}{(2 \pi)^{2 D}} \iiint \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_1, t)}{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_2, t')}}_0 \: e^{i (\vb{q}_1 - \vb{q}) \cdot \vb{r}} e^{i (\vb{q}_2 + \vb{q}) \cdot \vb{r}'} \dd{\vb{q}_1} \dd{\vb{q}_2} \dd{\vb{r}} \\ &= -\frac{i}{\hbar} \frac{\Theta(t \!-\! t')}{(2 \pi)^D} \iint \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_1, t)}{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_2, t')}}_0 \: \delta(\vb{q}_1 \!-\! \vb{q}) \: e^{i (\vb{q}_2 + \vb{q}) \cdot \vb{r}'} \dd{\vb{q}_1} \dd{\vb{q}_2} \\ &= -\frac{i}{\hbar} \frac{\Theta(t \!-\! t')}{(2 \pi)^D} \int \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}, t)}{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_2, t')}}_0 \: e^{i (\vb{q}_2 + \vb{q}) \cdot \vb{r}'} \dd{\vb{q}_2} \end{aligned}

On the left, r′\vb{r}' does not appear, so it must also disappear on the right. To handle this properly, we consider an arbitrary finite piece of volume VV of this infinite system. Clearly ∫Vdr′=V\int_V \dd{\vb{r}'} = V, so:

χ(q;t,t′)=−iℏΘ(t ⁣− ⁣t′)(2π)D1V∫V∫−∞∞⟨[n^I(q,t),n^I(q2,t′)]⟩0 ei(q2+q)⋅r′dq2dr′\begin{aligned} \chi(\vb{q}; t, t') &= -\frac{i}{\hbar} \frac{\Theta(t \!-\! t')}{(2 \pi)^D} \frac{1}{V} \int_V \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}, t)}{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_2, t')}}_0 \: e^{i (\vb{q}_2 + \vb{q}) \cdot \vb{r}'} \dd{\vb{q}_2} \dd{\vb{r}'} \end{aligned}

This gives a Dirac delta function when we recover the full infinite system by letting V→∞V \to \infty (we will take this limit properly later, but beware that some authors set V=1V = 1 until then):

χ(q;t,t′)=−iℏVΘ(t−t′)∫−∞∞⟨[n^I(q,t),n^I(q2,t′)]⟩0 δ(q2 ⁣+ ⁣q)dq2=−iℏVΘ(t−t′)⟨[n^I(q,t),n^I(−q,t′)]⟩0\begin{aligned} \chi(\vb{q}; t, t') &= -\frac{i}{\hbar V} \Theta(t - t') \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}, t)}{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}_2, t')}}_0 \: \delta(\vb{q}_2 \!+\! \vb{q}) \dd{\vb{q}_2} \\ &= -\frac{i}{\hbar V} \Theta(t - t') \Expval{\Comm{\hat{n}_I(\vb{q}, t)}{\hat{n}_I(-\vb{q}, t')}}_0 \end{aligned}

Similarly, if the unperturbed Hamiltonian H^0\hat{H}_0 is time-independent, then χ\chi only depends on the time difference t−t′t - t'. Note that δ⟨n^⟩\delta{\Expval{\hat{n}}} already has the form of a Fourier transform t−t′→ω+iηt - t' \to \omega + i \eta, which gives us an opportunity to rewrite χ\chi in the Lehmann representation:

χ(q,ω)=1ZV∑νν′⟨ν∣n^S(q)∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣n^S(−q)∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+Eν−Eν′(e−βEν−e−βEν′)\begin{aligned} \chi(\vb{q}, \omega) = \frac{1}{Z V} \sum_{\nu \nu'} \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{n}_S(\vb{q})}{\nu'} \matrixel{\nu'}{\hat{n}_S(-\vb{q})}{\nu}}{\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + E_\nu - E_{\nu'}} \Big( e^{-\beta E_\nu} - e^{- \beta E_{\nu'}} \Big) \end{aligned}

Where ∣ν⟩\Ket{\nu} and ∣ν′⟩\Ket{\nu'} are many-particle eigenstates of H^0\hat{H}_0, and ZZ is the grand partition function. To get ready for the calculations ahead, we swap ν\nu and ν′\nu' in the second term, so the response function is as shown below. All operators are in the Schrödinger picture from now on:

χ(q,ω)=1ZV∑νν′(⟨ν∣n^(q)∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣n^(−q)∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+Eν−Eν′−⟨ν∣n^(−q)∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣n^(q)∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+Eν′−Eν)e−βEν\begin{aligned} \chi(\vb{q}, \omega) = \frac{1}{Z V} \sum_{\nu \nu'} \bigg( \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{n}(\vb{q})}{\nu'} \matrixel{\nu'}{\hat{n}(-\vb{q})}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + E_\nu - E_{\nu'}} - \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{n}(-\vb{q})}{\nu'} \matrixel{\nu'}{\hat{n}(\vb{q})}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + E_{\nu'} - E_\nu} \bigg) e^{-\beta E_\nu} \end{aligned}

Next, we need to rewrite n^(q)\hat{n}(\vb{q}) somehow. To do this, we must neglect electron-electron interactions, leaving us with a simple Fermi gas. In that model, VV is a cube with periodic boundary conditions, meaning that q\vb{q} has a discrete spectrum of allowed values, and the single-electron states are just plane waves. This lets us write, in the second quantization:

n^(q)=∑σkc^σ,k†c^σ,k+qn^(−q)=n^†(q)\begin{aligned} \hat{n}(\vb{q}) = \sum_{\sigma \vb{k}} \hat{c}_{\sigma,\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\sigma,\vb{k} + \vb{q}} \qquad \qquad \hat{n}(-\vb{q}) = \hat{n}^\dagger(\vb{q}) \end{aligned}

Starting from the definition of n^(r)\hat{n}(\vb{r}), we write out the field operators Ψ^(r)\hat{\Psi}(\vb{r}), and insert the known non-interacting single-electron orbitals ψk(r)=eik⋅r/V\psi_\vb{k}(\vb{r}) = e^{i \vb{k} \cdot \vb{r}} / \sqrt{V}, omitting spin:

n^(r)≡Ψ^†(r)Ψ^(r)=∑kk′ψk∗(r) ψk′(r) c^k†c^k′=1V∑kk′ei(k′−k)⋅rc^k†c^k′\begin{aligned} \hat{n}(\vb{r}) \equiv \hat{\Psi}{}^\dagger(\vb{r}) \hat{\Psi}(\vb{r}) = \sum_{\vb{k} \vb{k}'} \psi_{\vb{k}}^*(\vb{r}) \: \psi_{\vb{k}'}(\vb{r})\: \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}'} = \frac{1}{V} \sum_{\vb{k} \vb{k}'} e^{i (\vb{k}' - \vb{k}) \cdot \vb{r}} \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}'} \end{aligned}

Taking the Fourier transfom yields a Dirac delta function δ\delta:

n^(q)=1V∫−∞∞∑kk′c^k†c^k′ ei(k′−k−q)⋅rdr=(2π)DV∑kk′c^k†c^k′ δ(k′ ⁣− ⁣k ⁣− ⁣q)\begin{aligned} \hat{n}(\vb{q}) = \frac{1}{V} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \sum_{\vb{k} \vb{k}'} \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}'} \: e^{i (\vb{k}' - \vb{k} - \vb{q})\cdot \vb{r}} \dd{\vb{r}} = \frac{(2 \pi)^D}{V} \sum_{\vb{k} \vb{k}'} \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}'} \: \delta(\vb{k}' \!-\! \vb{k} \!-\! \vb{q}) \end{aligned}

Thanks to our periodic boundary conditions, this trick lets us turn a sum into an integral:

n^(q)=(2π)DVV(2π)D∑k∫−∞∞c^k†c^k′ δ(k′ ⁣− ⁣k ⁣− ⁣q)dk′=∑kc^k†c^k+q\begin{aligned} \hat{n}(\vb{q}) &= \frac{(2 \pi)^D}{V} \frac{V}{(2 \pi)^D} \sum_{\vb{k}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}'} \: \delta(\vb{k}' \!-\! \vb{k} \!-\! \vb{q}) \dd{\vb{k}'} = \sum_{\vb{k}} \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} \end{aligned}

For negated arguments, we simply define k′≡k−q\vb{k}' \equiv \vb{k} - \vb{q} to show that n^(−q)=n^†(q)\hat{n}(-\vb{q}) = \hat{n}{}^\dagger(\vb{q}), which can also be understood as a consequence of n^(r)\hat{n}(\vb{r}) being real:

n^(−q)=∑kc^k†c^k−q=∑k′c^k′+q†c^k′=n^†(q)\begin{aligned} \hat{n}(-\vb{q}) = \sum_{\vb{k}} \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} - \vb{q}} = \sum_{\vb{k}'} \hat{c}_{\vb{k}' + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}'} = \hat{n}^\dagger(\vb{q}) \end{aligned}

When neglecting interactions, it is tradition to rename χ\chi to χ0\chi_0. We insert n^\hat{n}, suppressing spin:

χ0(q,ω)=1ZV∑kk′∑νν′(⟨ν∣c^k†c^k+q∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣c^k′+q†c^k′∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+Eν−Eν′−⟨ν∣c^k+q†c^k∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣c^k′†c^k′+q∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+Eν′−Eν)e−βEν\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) &= \frac{1}{Z V} \sum_{\vb{k} \vb{k}'} \sum_{\nu \nu'} \bigg( \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}}{\nu'} \matrixel{\nu'}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}' + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}'}}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + E_\nu - E_{\nu'}} - \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}}{\nu'} \matrixel{\nu'}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}'}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}' + \vb{q}}}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + E_{\nu'} - E_\nu} \bigg) e^{-\beta E_\nu} \end{aligned}

Here, ⟨ν∣c^k†c^k+q∣ν′⟩\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}}{\nu'} is only nonzero if ∣ν′⟩\Ket{\nu'} is contructed from ∣ν⟩\Ket{\nu} by moving an electron from k\vb{k} to k ⁣+ ⁣q\vb{k} \!+\! \vb{q}, and analogously for the other inner products. As a result, k=k′\vb{k} = \vb{k}' (and σ=σ′\sigma = \sigma').

For the same reason, the energy difference Eν−Eν′E_\nu - E_{\nu'} can simply be replaced by the cost of the single-particle excitation ξk−ξk+q\xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}, where ξk\xi_{\vb{k}} is the energy of a k\vb{k}-orbital. Therefore:

χ0(q,ω)=1ZV∑k∑νν′(⟨ν∣c^k†c^k+q∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣c^k+q†c^k∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q−⟨ν∣c^k+q†c^k∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣c^k†c^k+q∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q)e−βEν\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) &= \frac{1}{Z V} \sum_{\vb{k}} \sum_{\nu \nu'} \bigg( \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}}{\nu'} \matrixel{\nu'}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} - \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}}{\nu'} \matrixel{\nu'}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \bigg) e^{-\beta E_\nu} \end{aligned}

Notice that we have eliminated all dependence on ∣ν′⟩\Ket{\nu'}, so we remove it by ∑ν′∣ν′⟩⟨ν′∣=1\sum_{\nu'} \Ket{\nu'} \Bra{\nu'} = 1:

χ0(q,ω)=1ZV∑k∑ν(⟨ν∣c^k†c^k+qc^k+q†c^k∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q−⟨ν∣c^k+q†c^kc^k†c^k+q∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q)e−βEν=1ZV∑k∑ν⟨ν∣[c^k†c^k+q,c^k+q†c^k] e−βH^0∣ν⟩ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) &= \frac{1}{Z V} \sum_{\vb{k}} \sum_{\nu} \bigg( \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} - \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}} \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \bigg) e^{-\beta E_\nu} \\ &= \frac{1}{Z V} \sum_{\vb{k}} \sum_{\nu} \frac{\matrixel{\nu}{\comm{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} {\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}} \: e^{- \beta \hat{H}_0}}{\nu}} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \end{aligned}

Where we recognized the commutator, and eliminated EνE_\nu using H^0∣n⟩=Eν∣ν⟩\hat{H}_0 \Ket{n} = E_\nu \Ket{\nu}. The resulting expression has the form of a matrix trace Tr\Tr, and therefore a thermal expectation ⟨⟩0\Expval{}_0:

χ0(q,ω)=1ZV∑kTr ⁣([c^k†c^k+q,c^k+q†c^k] e−βH^0)ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q=1V∑k⟨[c^k†c^k+q,c^k+q†c^k]⟩0ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) &= \frac{1}{Z V} \sum_{\vb{k}} \frac{\Tr\!\big(\comm{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} {\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}} \: e^{- \beta \hat{H}_0} \big)} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \\ &= \frac{1}{V} \sum_{\vb{k}} \frac{\expval{\comm{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}}}_0} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \end{aligned}

The commutator can be evaluated, and in this particular case it turns out to be:

[c^k†c^k+q,c^k+q†c^k]=c^k†c^k−c^k+q†c^k+q\begin{aligned} \comm{\hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}}{\hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}} = \hat{c}_{\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k}} - \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} \end{aligned}

In general, for any single-particle states labeled by mm, nn, oo and pp, we have:

[c^m†c^n,c^o†c^p]=c^m†c^nc^o†c^p−c^o†c^pc^m†c^n=c^m†({c^n,c^o†}−c^o†c^n)c^p−c^o†({c^p,c^m†}−c^m†c^p)c^n\begin{aligned} \comm{\hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_n}{\hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_p} &= \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_n \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_p - \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_p \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_n \\ &= \hat{c}_m^\dagger \big( \acomm{\hat{c}_n}{\hat{c}_o^\dagger} - \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_n \big) \hat{c}_p - \hat{c}_o^\dagger \big( \acomm{\hat{c}_p}{\hat{c}_m^\dagger} - \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_p \big) \hat{c}_n \end{aligned}

Using the standard fermion anticommutation relations, this becomes:

[c^m†c^n,c^o†c^p]=c^m†(δno−c^o†c^n)c^p−c^o†(δpm−c^m†c^p)c^n=c^m†c^p δno−c^m†c^o†c^nc^p−c^o†c^n δpm+c^o†c^m†c^pc^n=c^m†c^p δno−c^o†c^n δpm\begin{aligned} \comm{\hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_n}{\hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_p} &= \hat{c}_m^\dagger \big( \delta_{no} - \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_n \big) \hat{c}_p - \hat{c}_o^\dagger \big( \delta_{pm} - \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_p \big) \hat{c}_n \\ &= \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_p \: \delta_{no} - \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_n \hat{c}_p - \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_n \: \delta_{pm} + \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_p \hat{c}_n \\ &= \hat{c}_m^\dagger \hat{c}_p \: \delta_{no} - \hat{c}_o^\dagger \hat{c}_n \: \delta_{pm} \end{aligned}

In this case, m=p=km = p = \vb{k} and n=o=k ⁣+ ⁣qn = o = \vb{k} \!+\! \vb{q}, so the Kronecker deltas are unnecessary.

We substitute this result into χ0\chi_0, and reintroduce the spin index σ\sigma associated with k\vb{k}:

χ0(q,ω)=1V∑σk⟨c^σ,k†c^σ,k−c^σ,k+q†c^σ,k+q⟩0ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) = \frac{1}{V} \sum_{\sigma \vb{k}} \frac{\expval{\hat{c}_{\sigma,\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\sigma,\vb{k}} - \hat{c}_{\sigma,\vb{k}+\vb{q}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\sigma,\vb{k}+\vb{q}}}_0} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \end{aligned}

The operator c^σ.k†c^σ.k\hat{c}_{\sigma.\vb{k}}^\dagger \hat{c}_{\sigma.\vb{k}} simply counts the number of electrons in state (σ,k)(\sigma, \vb{k}), which is given by the Fermi-Dirac distribution nFn_F. This gives us the Lindhard response function:

χ0(q,ω)=1V∑σknF(ξk)−nF(ξk+q)ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) = \frac{1}{V} \sum_{\sigma \vb{k}} \frac{n_F(\xi_{\vb{k}}) - n_F(\xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}})} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} } \end{aligned}

This is its most general form, but we can go further by exploiting the Fermi gas’ periodic boundary conditions, which enable us to turn the sum into an integral. Furthermore, electrons are spin-1/2 particles, so ∑σ\sum_{\sigma} simply gives a constant factor 22:

χ0(q,ω)=2(2π)D∫−∞∞nF(ξk)−nF(ξk+q)ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+qdk\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) = \frac{2}{(2 \pi)^D} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{n_F(\xi_{\vb{k}}) - n_F(\xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}})} {\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \dd{\vb{k}} } \end{aligned}

Beware that some authors define χ0\chi_0 as the response of the charge density to an electric potential, leading to an extra factor e02e_0^2, where e0e_0 is the electron charge. In contrast, our result describes the particle density response due to an energy potential.

Evaluation

Let us consider D=3D = 3 (calculations in 1D or 2D are also possible), and rewrite the integrand by substituting k′≡−k−q\vb{k}' \equiv - \vb{k} - \vb{q} in the second term and using ξ−k=ξk\xi_{-\vb{k}} = \xi_{\vb{k}}:

χ0(q,ω)=2(2π)3∫−∞∞(nF(ξk)ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q−nF(ξk+q)ℏ(ω+iη)+ξk−ξk+q)dk=14π3(∫−∞∞nF(ξk)ξk−ξk+q+ℏ(ω+iη)dk−∫−∞∞nF(ξ−k′)ξ−k′−q−ξ−k′+ℏ(ω+iη)dk′)=14π3∫−∞∞(1ξk−ξk+q+ℏ(ω+iη)+1ξk−ξk+q−ℏ(ω+iη))nF(ξk)dk\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) &= \frac{2}{(2 \pi)^3} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \bigg( \frac{n_F(\xi_{\vb{k}})}{\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} - \frac{n_F(\xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}})}{\hbar (\omega + i \eta) + \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}}} \bigg) \dd{\vb{k}} \\ &= \frac{1}{4 \pi^3} \bigg( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{n_F(\xi_{\vb{k}})}{\xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} + \hbar (\omega + i \eta)} \dd{\vb{k}} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{n_F(\xi_{- \vb{k}'})}{\xi_{- \vb{k}' - \vb{q}} - \xi_{- \vb{k}'} + \hbar (\omega + i \eta)} \dd{\vb{k}'} \bigg) \\ &= \frac{1}{4 \pi^3} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \bigg( \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} + \hbar (\omega + i \eta)} + \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} - \hbar (\omega + i \eta)} \bigg) n_F(\xi_{\vb{k}}) \dd{\vb{k}} \end{aligned}

Considering the system’s symmetry, it is natural to switch to spherical coordinates (∣k∣,θ,φ)(|\vb{k}|, \theta, \varphi):

χ0=14π3∫0∞ ⁣ ⁣∫0π ⁣∫−ππ ⁣(1ξk ⁣− ⁣ξk+q+ℏ(ω ⁣+ ⁣iη)+1ξk ⁣− ⁣ξk+q−ℏ(ω ⁣+ ⁣iη))nF(ξk) ∣k∣2sin⁡θdφdθd∣k∣=2π4π3∫0∞ ⁣ ⁣∫0π(1ξk ⁣− ⁣ξk+q+ℏ(ω ⁣+ ⁣iη)+1ξk ⁣− ⁣ξk+q−ℏ(ω ⁣+ ⁣iη))nF(ξk) ∣k∣2sin⁡θdθd∣k∣\begin{aligned} \chi_0 &= \frac{1}{4 \pi^3} \int_0^\infty \!\! \int_0^\pi \! \int_{-\pi}^\pi \! \bigg( \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} \!-\! \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} + \hbar (\omega \!+\! i \eta)} + \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} \!-\! \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} - \hbar (\omega \!+\! i \eta)} \bigg) n_F(\xi_{\vb{k}}) \, |\vb{k}|^2 \sin{\theta} \dd{\varphi} \dd{\theta} \dd{|\vb{k}|} \\ &= \frac{2 \pi}{4 \pi^3} \int_0^\infty \!\! \int_0^\pi \bigg( \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} \!-\! \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} + \hbar (\omega \!+\! i \eta)} + \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} \!-\! \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} - \hbar (\omega \!+\! i \eta)} \bigg) n_F(\xi_{\vb{k}}) \, |\vb{k}|^2 \sin{\theta} \dd{\theta} \dd{|\vb{k}|} \end{aligned}

At absolute zero T=0T = 0, the Fermi gas has a well-known ground state, in which the occupied single-particle plane wave states form a sphere in k\vb{k}-space with radius kFk_F. This is a good approximation for nonzero TT too, because in practice, the electrons’ Fermi level ξF≡ℏ2kF2/(2m)\xi_F \equiv \hbar^2 k_F^2 / (2 m) is huge compared to thermal excitations. Formally, nF(ξk)≈Θ(kF−∣k∣)n_F(\xi_\vb{k}) \approx \Theta(k_F - |\vb{k}|), so we adjust the integration limit:

χ0≈12π2∫0kF ⁣∫0π(1ξk ⁣− ⁣ξk+q+ℏ(ω ⁣+ ⁣iη)+1ξk ⁣− ⁣ξk+q−ℏ(ω ⁣+ ⁣iη))∣k∣2sin⁡θdθd∣k∣\begin{aligned} \chi_0 &\approx \frac{1}{2 \pi^2} \int_0^{k_F} \! \int_0^\pi \bigg( \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} \!-\! \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} + \hbar (\omega \!+\! i \eta)} + \frac{1}{\xi_{\vb{k}} \!-\! \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} - \hbar (\omega \!+\! i \eta)} \bigg) |\vb{k}|^2 \sin{\theta} \dd{\theta} \dd{|\vb{k}|} \end{aligned}

Next, let us take a closer look at the excitation energy in the denominator. Thanks to symmetry, we can always choose our coordinate system such that q\vb{q} points in the θ=0\theta = 0 direction, yielding:

ξk−ξk+q=ℏ22m((k⋅k)−(k ⁣+ ⁣q)⋅(k ⁣+ ⁣q))=−ℏ22m(∣q∣2+2∣k∣∣q∣cos⁡θ)\begin{aligned} \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} &= \frac{\hbar^2}{2 m} \Big( (\vb{k} \cdot \vb{k}) - (\vb{k} \!+\! \vb{q}) \cdot (\vb{k} \!+\! \vb{q}) \Big) \\ &= - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 m} \Big( |\vb{q}|^2 + 2 |\vb{k}| |\vb{q}| \cos{\theta} \Big) \end{aligned}

By defining the dimensionless variables x≡∣q∣/(2kF)x \equiv |\vb{q}| / (2 k_F) and κ≡∣k∣/kF\kappa \equiv |\vb{k}| / k_F, and recognizing the Fermi energy ξF=ℏ2kF2/(2m)\xi_F = \hbar^2 k_F^2 / (2 m), this turns into:

ξk−ξk+q=−4ξF(x2+xκcos⁡θ)\begin{aligned} \xi_{\vb{k}} - \xi_{\vb{k} + \vb{q}} &= - 4 \xi_F (x^2 + x \kappa \cos{\theta}) \end{aligned}

We insert this back into χ0\chi_0, and abbreviate y≡ℏ(ω+iη)/(4ξF)y \equiv \hbar (\omega + i \eta) / (4 \xi_F) and c≡cos⁡θc \equiv \cos{\theta}, giving:

χ0=kF38π2ξF∫01 ⁣∫−11(1−x2−xκc+y+1−x2−xκc−y)κ2dcdκ\begin{aligned} \chi_0 &= \frac{k_F^3}{8 \pi^2 \xi_F} \int_0^1 \! \int_{-1}^1 \bigg( \frac{1}{-x^2 - x \kappa c + y} + \frac{1}{-x^2 - x \kappa c - y} \bigg) \kappa^2 \dd{c} \dd{\kappa} \end{aligned}

From now on, we need to treat χ0\chi_0’s real and imaginary parts separately using the Sokhotski-Plemelj theorem. The following is valid for the real part, but is (for now) still written as a complex expression. The point is that, to the best of my knowledge, it is not practical to extract the imaginary part from the “real part’s complex result” so to speak. So, hiding the principal value:

χ0=−kF38π2ξF∫01 ⁣∫−11(1xκc+x2−y+1xκc+x2+y)κ2dcdκ=−mkF4π2ℏ2∫01[1xκln⁡(xκc+x2−y)+1xκln⁡(xκc+x2+y)]−11κ2dκ=−mkF4π2ℏ21x∫01(ln⁡ ⁣(κ+x−y/x−κ+x−y/x)+ln⁡ ⁣(κ+x+y/x−κ+x+y/x))κdκ\begin{aligned} \chi_0 &= \frac{-k_F^3}{8 \pi^2 \xi_F} \int_0^1 \! \int_{-1}^1 \bigg( \frac{1}{x \kappa c + x^2 - y} + \frac{1}{x \kappa c + x^2 + y} \bigg) \kappa^2 \dd{c} \dd{\kappa} \\ &= \frac{-m k_F}{4 \pi^2 \hbar^2} \int_0^1 \bigg[ \frac{1}{x \kappa} \ln(x \kappa c + x^2 - y) + \frac{1}{x \kappa} \ln(x \kappa c + x^2 + y) \bigg]_{-1}^1 \kappa^2 \dd{\kappa} \\ &= \frac{-m k_F}{4 \pi^2 \hbar^2} \frac{1}{x} \int_0^1 \bigg( \ln\!\bigg( \frac{\kappa + x - y / x}{-\kappa + x - y / x} \bigg) + \ln\!\bigg( \frac{\kappa + x + y / x}{-\kappa + x + y / x} \bigg) \bigg) \kappa \dd{\kappa} \end{aligned}

We abbreviate this further by defining z+≡x+y/xz_{+} \equiv x + y / x and z−≡x−y/xz_{-} \equiv x - y / x, yielding:

χ0=−mkF4π2ℏ21x∫01ln⁡ ⁣((κ+z−)(κ+z+)(κ−z−)(κ−z+))κdκ\begin{aligned} \chi_0 &= \frac{-m k_F}{4 \pi^2 \hbar^2} \frac{1}{x} \int_0^1 \ln\!\bigg( \frac{(\kappa + z_{-})(\kappa + z_{+})}{(\kappa - z_{-})(\kappa - z_{+})} \bigg) \kappa \dd{\kappa} \end{aligned}

Looking up this integral leads to the expression below. Note that all terms disappear for κ=0\kappa = 0:

χ0=−mkF4π2ℏ21x[κ(z+ ⁣+ ⁣z−)−z+2tanh⁡−1 ⁣( ⁣κz+ ⁣)−z−2tanh⁡−1 ⁣( ⁣κz− ⁣)+12κ2ln⁡ ⁣((κ+z+)(κ+z−)(κ−z−)(κ−z+))]01=−mkFπ2ℏ214x(2x−z+2tanh⁡−1 ⁣( ⁣1z+ ⁣)−z−2tanh⁡−1 ⁣( ⁣1z− ⁣)+12ln⁡ ⁣((1+z+)(1+z−)(1−z−)(1−z+)))=−mkFπ2ℏ218x(4x−z+2ln⁡ ⁣(z++1z+−1)−z−2ln⁡ ⁣(z−+1z−−1)+ln⁡ ⁣((z++1)(z−+1)(z+−1)(z−−1)))=−mkFπ2ℏ2(12+18x(1−z+2)ln⁡ ⁣(z++1z+−1)+18x(1−z−2)ln⁡ ⁣(z−+1z−−1))\begin{aligned} \chi_0 &= \frac{-m k_F}{4 \pi^2 \hbar^2} \frac{1}{x} \bigg[ \kappa (z_{+} \!+\! z_{-}) - z_{+}^2 \tanh^{-1}\!\bigg(\!\frac{\kappa}{z_{+}}\!\bigg) - z_{-}^2 \tanh^{-1}\!\bigg(\!\frac{\kappa}{z_{-}}\!\bigg) + \frac{1}{2} \kappa^2 \ln\!\bigg( \frac{(\kappa + z_{+})(\kappa + z_{-})}{(\kappa - z_{-})(\kappa - z_{+})} \bigg) \bigg]_0^1 \\ &= \frac{-m k_F}{\pi^2 \hbar^2} \frac{1}{4 x} \bigg( 2 x - z_{+}^2 \tanh^{-1}\!\bigg(\!\frac{1}{z_{+}}\!\bigg) - z_{-}^2 \tanh^{-1}\!\bigg(\!\frac{1}{z_{-}}\!\bigg) + \frac{1}{2} \ln\!\bigg( \frac{(1 + z_{+})(1 + z_{-})}{(1 - z_{-})(1 - z_{+})} \bigg) \bigg) \\ &= \frac{-m k_F}{\pi^2 \hbar^2} \frac{1}{8 x} \bigg( 4 x - z_{+}^2 \ln\!\bigg( \frac{z_{+} + 1}{z_{+} - 1} \bigg) - z_{-}^2 \ln\!\bigg( \frac{z_{-} + 1}{z_{-} - 1} \bigg) + \ln\!\bigg( \frac{(z_{+} + 1)(z_{-} + 1)}{(z_{+} - 1)(z_{-} - 1)} \bigg) \bigg) \\ &= \frac{-m k_F}{\pi^2 \hbar^2} \bigg( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{8 x} (1 - z_{+}^2) \ln\!\bigg( \frac{z_{+} + 1}{z_{+} - 1} \bigg) + \frac{1}{8 x} (1 - z_{-}^2) \ln\!\bigg( \frac{z_{-} + 1}{z_{-} - 1} \bigg) \bigg) \end{aligned}

Finally, we also know that the density of states gg per unit volume of a Fermi gas is given by:

g(ξF)=24π2(2mℏ2)3/2ξF1/2=mkFπ2ℏ2\begin{aligned} g(\xi_F) = \frac{2}{4 \pi^2} \bigg( \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \bigg)^{3/2} \xi_F^{1/2} = \frac{m k_F}{\pi^2 \hbar^2} \end{aligned}

Now we officially take the real part, and arrive at the following expression for the response function of non-interacting electrons:

Reχ0(q,ω)=−g(ξF) F(∣q∣2kF, ℏω4ξF)\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \Real{\chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega)} = - g(\xi_F) \: \mathcal{F}\bigg(\frac{|\vb{q}|}{2 k_F}, \: \frac{\hbar \omega}{4 \xi_F}\bigg) } \end{aligned}

Where F\mathcal{F} (which is sometimes also called the Lindhard function), is defined like so:

F(x,y)≡12+18x(1−(x+yx) ⁣2)ln⁡ ⁣∣x+y/x+1x+y/x−1∣+18x(1−(x−yx) ⁣2)ln⁡ ⁣∣x−y/x+1x−y/x−1∣\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \mathcal{F}(x, y) \equiv \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{8 x} \bigg( 1 - \Big(x + \frac{y}{x}\Big)^{\!2} \bigg) \ln\!\bigg| \frac{x + y/x + 1}{x + y/x - 1} \bigg| + \frac{1}{8 x} \bigg( 1 - \Big(x - \frac{y}{x}\Big)^{\!2} \bigg) \ln\!\bigg| \frac{x - y/x + 1}{x - y/x - 1} \bigg| } \end{aligned}

Now we move on to χ0\chi_0’s imaginary part. Recall the following expression from earlier:

χ0=−kF38π2ξF1x∫01 ⁣∫−11(1x+y/x+κc+1x−y/x+κc)κ2dcdκ\begin{aligned} \chi_0 &= \frac{- k_F^3}{8 \pi^2 \xi_F} \frac{1}{x} \int_0^1 \! \int_{-1}^1 \bigg( \frac{1}{x + y/x + \kappa c} + \frac{1}{x - y/x + \kappa c} \bigg) \kappa^2 \dd{c} \dd{\kappa} \end{aligned}

The Sokhotski-Plemelj theorem then states that the imaginary part is as shown below. There is a nasty detail here regarding the positive infinitesimal η→0+\eta \to 0^{+}: the first input term’s denominator contains +iη+ i \eta, so the theorem can be applied normally, but the second term has −iη-i \eta, meaning the theorem’s output must be negated!

Imχ0=−2mkF38π2ℏ2kF21x∫01 ⁣∫−11( ⁣− ⁣πδ(z++κc)+πδ(z−+κc))κ2dcdκ=πmkF4π2ℏ21x∫01[1κΘ(z++κc)−1κΘ(z−+κc)]−11κ2dκ=π4x g(ξF)∫01(Θ(z++κ)−Θ(z+−κ)−Θ(z−+κ)+Θ(z−−κ))κdκ\begin{aligned} \Imag{\chi_0} &= \frac{-2 m k_F^3}{8 \pi^2 \hbar^2 k_F^2} \frac{1}{x} \int_0^1 \! \int_{-1}^1 \bigg( \!-\! \pi \delta(z_{+} + \kappa c) + \pi \delta(z_{-} + \kappa c) \bigg) \kappa^2 \dd{c} \dd{\kappa} \\ &= \frac{\pi m k_F}{4 \pi^2 \hbar^2} \frac{1}{x} \int_0^1 \bigg[ \frac{1}{\kappa} \Theta(z_{+} + \kappa c) - \frac{1}{\kappa} \Theta(z_{-} + \kappa c) \bigg]_{-1}^1 \kappa^2 \dd{\kappa} \\ &= \frac{\pi}{4 x} \: g(\xi_F) \int_0^1 \bigg( \Theta(z_{+} + \kappa) - \Theta(z_{+} - \kappa) - \Theta(z_{-} + \kappa) + \Theta(z_{-} - \kappa) \bigg) \kappa \dd{\kappa} \end{aligned}

These integrals are easily evaluated according to the following straightforward relations:

∫01Θ(α−κ) κdκ=12(α2−(α2−1) Θ(α−1)) Θ(α)∫01Θ(α+κ) κdκ=12(α2 Θ(α)−α2+1) Θ(α+1)\begin{aligned} \int_0^1 \Theta(\alpha - \kappa) \: \kappa \dd{\kappa} &= \frac{1}{2} \big( \alpha^2 - (\alpha^2 - 1) \: \Theta(\alpha - 1) \big) \: \Theta(\alpha) \\ \int_0^1 \Theta(\alpha + \kappa) \: \kappa \dd{\kappa} &= \frac{1}{2} \big( \alpha^2 \: \Theta(\alpha) - \alpha^2 + 1 \big) \: \Theta(\alpha + 1) \end{aligned}

Let us assume that y>0y > 0 for now, such that z+>0z_{+} > 0 and z+>z−z_{+} > z_{-}. We can then naively distinguish several options to be considered:

  1. z+>z−>1>0>−1z_{+} > z_{-} > 1 > 0 > -1.
  2. z+>1>z−>0>−1z_{+} > 1 > z_{-} > 0 > -1.
  3. z+>1>0>z−>−1z_{+} > 1 > 0 > z_{-} > -1.
  4. z+>1>0>−1>z−z_{+} > 1 > 0 > -1 > z_{-}.
  5. 1>z+>z−>0>−11 > z_{+} > z_{-} > 0 > -1.
  6. 1>z+>0>z−>−11 > z_{+} > 0 > z_{-} > -1.
  7. 1>z+>0>−1>z−1 > z_{+} > 0 > -1 > z_{-}.

It can be shown that #7 is impossible due to the definitions of z+z_{+} and z−z_{-}. A tedious investigation of the six remaining cases then yields:

  1. In cases #1 or #4, or, equivalently, if both ∣z+∣>1|z_{+}| > 1 and ∣z−∣>1|z_{-}| > 1, the result vanishes:

    Imχ0=0\begin{aligned} \Imag{\chi_0} = 0 \end{aligned}

    An alternative statement of those conditions can be found, namely:

    {y>x2+xif x<1x2−x>y>0if x>1\begin{aligned} \begin{cases} y > x^2 + x &\mathrm{if} \: x < 1 \\ x^2 - x > y > 0 &\mathrm{if} \: x > 1 \end{cases} \end{aligned}
  2. In cases #2 or #3, or, equivalently, if both ∣z+∣>1|z_{+}| > 1 and ∣z−∣<1|z_{-}| < 1, the result is parabolic in yy. These conditions can be restated as x2+x>y>∣x2−x∣x^2 + x > y > |x^2 - x|.

    Imχ0=−π8x g(ξF) (1−z−2)\begin{aligned} \Imag{\chi_0} &= -\frac{\pi}{8 x} \: g(\xi_F) \: (1 - z_{-}^2) \end{aligned}
  3. In cases #5 or #6, or, equivalently, if both ∣z+∣<1|z_{+}| < 1 and ∣z−∣<1|z_{-}| < 1 the result is linear in yy. These conditions can be restated as −(x2−x)>y>0-(x^2 - x) > y > 0.

    Imχ0=π8x g(ξF) (z−2−z+2)=−π2x g(ξF) y\begin{aligned} \Imag{\chi_0} &= \frac{\pi}{8 x} \: g(\xi_F) \: (z_{-}^2 - z_{+}^2) = - \frac{\pi}{2 x} \: g(\xi_F) \: y \end{aligned}

Repeating the analysis for y<0y < 0 and putting everything together, we arrive at the following formula for the imaginary part of the non-interacting response function:

Imχ0(q,ω)=−g(ξF) G(∣q∣2kF, ℏω4ξF)G(x,y)≡{0if ∣y∣>x2+x>0sgn(y)π8x(1−(x−∣y∣x)2)if x2+x>∣y∣>∣x2−x∣π2xyif  ⁣− ⁣(x2−x)>∣y∣>00if x2−x>∣y∣>0\begin{gathered} \boxed{ \Imag{\chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega)} = - g(\xi_F) \: \mathcal{G}\bigg( \frac{|\vb{q}|}{2 k_F}, \: \frac{\hbar \omega}{4 \xi_F} \bigg) } \\ \boxed{ \mathcal{G}(x, y) \equiv \begin{cases} 0 &\mathrm{if} \: |y| > x^2 + x > 0 \\ \sgn(y) \displaystyle\frac{\pi}{8 x} \bigg( 1 - \Big( x - \displaystyle\frac{|y|}{x} \Big)^2 \bigg) &\mathrm{if} \: x^2 + x > |y| > |x^2 - x| \\ \displaystyle\frac{\pi}{2 x} y &\mathrm{if} \: \!-\!(x^2 - x) > |y| > 0 \\ 0 &\mathrm{if} \: x^2 - x > |y| > 0 \end{cases} } \end{gathered}

We are being a bit sloppy here by ignoring the boundaries, e.g. ∣y∣=x2−x|y| = x^2 - x. Fortunately, they are all naturally continuous, so either of the two neighboring formulas can be used.

Interpretation

From this, we would like to get the dielectric function εr\varepsilon_r. When an external electric field is applied, the electrons respond and thereby modify the net field inside the material. We include this effect in our energy potential UU, such that the net electric potential Φtot=U/e0\Phi_\mathrm{tot} = U / e_0 (where e0<0e_0 < 0). This is not the same as including direct electron-electron interactions!

We thus have a linear relation for the induced particle density δ ⁣⟨n^(q,ω)⟩=χ0(q,ω) U(q)\delta\!\Expval{\hat{n}(\vb{q}, \omega)} = \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) \: U(\vb{q}) thanks to the convolution theorem. The corresponding induced charge density is given by ρind=e02χ0Φtot\rho_\mathrm{ind} = e_0^2 \chi_0 \Phi_\mathrm{tot}, so the standard formula for εr\varepsilon_r yields:

εr(q,ω)=1−Uee(q) χ0(q,ω)\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \varepsilon_r(\vb{q}, \omega) = 1 - U_{ee}(\vb{q}) \: \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) } \end{aligned}

Where Uee(q)=e02/(ε0∣q∣2)U_{ee}(\vb{q}) = e_0^2 / (\varepsilon_0 |\vb{q}|^2) is Coulomb repulsion. This is the Lindhard dielectric function of a free non-interacting electron gas, at any temperature and for any dimensionality.

Lindhard theory can reproduce several notable discoveries in various limits. For long wavelengths q→0\vb{q} \to 0, i.e. x→0x \to 0, it can be shown that F(x,y)≈−x2/(3y2)\mathcal{F}(x, y) \approx - x^2 / (3 y^2), and therefore:

χ0(q,ω)≈mkFπ2ℏ2∣q∣24kF216ξF23ℏ2ω2=kF33π2m∣q∣2ω2\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, \omega) &\approx \frac{m k_F}{\pi^2 \hbar^2} \frac{|\vb{q}|^2}{4 k_F^2} \frac{16 \xi_F^2}{3 \hbar^2 \omega^2} = \frac{k_F^3}{3 \pi^2 m} \frac{|\vb{q}|^2}{\omega^2} \end{aligned}

For a Fermi gas, we know that kF3=3π2nk_F^3 = 3 \pi^2 n, where nn is the unperturbed density. Upon insertion into εr\varepsilon_r, this gives the same result as the Drude model, predicting plasma oscillations, also known as plasmons (when treated as quantized particles) or cold Langmuir waves:

εr(0,ω)=1−ωp2ω2ωp≡e02nε0m\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \varepsilon_r(0, \omega) = 1 - \frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2} } \qquad \qquad \boxed{ \omega_p \equiv \sqrt{\frac{e_0^2 n}{\varepsilon_0 m}} } \end{aligned}

Meanwhile, in the static limit ω→0\omega \to 0, i.e. y→0y \to 0, we arrive at a function that is also encountered when using the Hartree-Fock method to approximate the ground state of jellium:

F(x,0)=12+14x(1−x2)ln⁡ ⁣∣x+1x−1∣\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \mathcal{F}(x, 0) = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4 x} (1 - x^2) \ln\!\bigg| \frac{x + 1}{x - 1} \bigg| } \end{aligned}

If we assume small ∣q∣|\vb{q}| and xx again, it can be shown that F(x,0)≈1\mathcal{F}(x, 0) \approx 1, in which case:

χ0(q,0)=−mkF3π2ℏ2kF2=−3π2mnπ2ℏ2kF2=−3mnℏ2kF2=−3n2ξF\begin{aligned} \chi_0(\vb{q}, 0) = - \frac{m k_F^3}{\pi^2 \hbar^2 k_F^2} = - \frac{3 \pi^2 m n}{\pi^2 \hbar^2 k_F^2} = - \frac{3 m n}{\hbar^2 k_F^2} = - \frac{3 n}{2 \xi_F} \end{aligned}

The resulting dielectric function also appears in the derivation of Thomas-Fermi screening, which can be regarded as the zero-temperature limit of Debye screening:

εr(q,0)=1+kTF2∣q∣2kTF≡3e02n2ε0ξF\begin{aligned} \boxed{ \varepsilon_r(\vb{q}, 0) = 1 + \frac{k_\mathrm{TF}^2}{|\vb{q}|^2} } \qquad \qquad \boxed{ k_\mathrm{TF} \equiv \sqrt{\frac{3 e_0^2 n}{2 \varepsilon_0 \xi_F}} } \end{aligned}

But probably the greatest achievement of Lindhard theory is its appearance in the random phase approximation (where χ0\chi_0 is sometimes known as the retarded pair-bubble) for treating electron-electron Coulomb interactions in the Fermi gas model. So although we neglected interactions in our derivation, the result is an essential building block of interacting models.

References

  1. K.S. Thygesen, Advanced solid state physics: linear response theory, 2013, unpublished.
  2. H. Bruus, K. Flensberg, Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics, 2016, Oxford.
  3. G. Grosso, G.P. Parravicini, Solid state physics, 2nd edition, Elsevier.
  4. G.F. Giuliani, G. Vignale, Quantum theory of the electron liquid, 2005, Cambridge.
  5. B. Mihaila, Lindhard function of a dd-dimensional Fermi gas, 2011, arXiv.