diff options
author | Prefetch | 2021-11-28 17:15:39 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Prefetch | 2021-11-28 17:15:39 +0100 |
commit | 61271b92a793dd837d8326c7064cebd0a3fcdb39 (patch) | |
tree | e49c7e017a9ce189806c34109aa2164138f95ac0 /content/know/concept/detailed-balance | |
parent | eccfe8c4eb562ab7ddeddaf48f73e59c9dcdc284 (diff) |
Expand knowledge base
Diffstat (limited to 'content/know/concept/detailed-balance')
-rw-r--r-- | content/know/concept/detailed-balance/index.pdc | 238 |
1 files changed, 238 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/know/concept/detailed-balance/index.pdc b/content/know/concept/detailed-balance/index.pdc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1645c2d --- /dev/null +++ b/content/know/concept/detailed-balance/index.pdc @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ +--- +title: "Detailed balance" +firstLetter: "D" +publishDate: 2021-11-27 +categories: +- Physics +- Mathematics +- Stochastic analysis + +date: 2021-11-25T20:42:35+01:00 +draft: false +markup: pandoc +--- + +# Detailed balance + +Consider a system that can be regarded as a +[Markov process](/know/concept/markov-process/), +which means that its components (e.g. particles) are transitioning +between a known set of states, +with no history-dependence and no appreciable influence from interactions. + +At equilibrium, the principle of **detailed balance** then says that +for all states, the rate of leaving that state is exactly equal to +the rate of entering it, for every possible transition. +In effect, such a system looks "frozen" to an outside observer, +since all net transition rates are zero. + +We will focus on the case where both time and the state space are continuous. +Given some initial conditions, +assume that a component's trajectory can be described +as an [Itō diffusion](/know/concept/ito-calculus/) $X_t$ +with a time-independent drift $f$ and intensity $g$, +and with a probability density $\phi(t, x)$ governed by the +[forward Kolmogorov equation](/know/concept/kolmogorov-equations/) +(in 3D): + +$$\begin{aligned} + \pdv{\phi}{t} + = - \nabla \cdot \big( \vb{u} \phi - D \nabla \phi \big) +\end{aligned}$$ + +We start by demanding **stationarity**, +which is a weaker condition than detailed balance. +We want the probability $P$ of being in an arbitrary state volume $V$ +to be constant in time: + +$$\begin{aligned} + 0 + = \pdv{t} P(X_t \in V) + = \pdv{t} \int_V \phi \dd{V} + = \int_V \pdv{\phi}{t} \dd{V} +\end{aligned}$$ + +We substitute the forward Kolmogorov equation, +and apply the divergence theorem: + +$$\begin{aligned} + 0 + = - \int_V \nabla \cdot \big( \vb{u} \phi - D \nabla \phi \big) \dd{V} + = - \oint_{\partial V} \big( \vb{u} \phi - D \nabla \phi \big) \cdot \dd{\vb{S}} +\end{aligned}$$ + +In other words, the "flow" of probability *into* the volume $V$ +is equal to the flow *out of* $V$. +If such a probability density exists, +it is called a **stationary distribution** $\phi(t, x) = \pi(x)$. +Because $V$ was arbitrary, $\pi$ can be found by solving: + +$$\begin{aligned} + 0 + = - \nabla \cdot \big( \vb{u} \pi - D \nabla \pi \big) +\end{aligned}$$ + +Therefore, stationarity means that the state transition rates are constant. +To get detailed balance, however, we demand that +the transition rates are zero everywhere: +the probability flux through an arbitrary surface $S$ must vanish +(compare to closed surface integral above): + +$$\begin{aligned} + 0 + = - \int_{S} \big( \vb{u} \phi - D \nabla \phi \big) \cdot \dd{\vb{S}} +\end{aligned}$$ + +And since $S$ is arbitrary, this is only satisfied if the flux is trivially zero +(the above justification can easily be repeated in 1D, 2D, 4D, etc.): + +$$\begin{aligned} + \boxed{ + 0 = \vb{u} \phi - D \nabla \phi + } +\end{aligned}$$ + +This is a stronger condition that stationarity, +but fortunately often satisfied in practice. + +The fact that a system in detailed balance appears "frozen" +implies it is **time-reversible**, +meaning its statistics are the same for both directions of time. +Formally, given two arbitrary functions $h(x)$ and $k(x)$, +we have the property: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \boxed{ + \mathbf{E}\big[ h(X_0) \: k(X_t) \big] + = \mathbf{E}\big[ h(X_t) \: k(X_0) \big] + } +\end{aligned}$$ + +<div class="accordion"> +<input type="checkbox" id="proof-reversibility"/> +<label for="proof-reversibility">Proof</label> +<div class="hidden"> +<label for="proof-reversibility">Proof.</label> +Consider the following weighted inner product, +whose weight function is a stationary distribution $\pi$ +satisfying detailed balance, +where $\hat{L}$ is the Kolmogorov operator: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \braket*{\hat{L} h}{k}_\pi + \equiv \int_{-\infty}^\infty \hat{L}\{h(x)\} \: \pi(x) \: k(x) \dd{x} + = \int_{-\infty}^\infty h(x) \: \hat{L}{}^\dagger\{\pi(x) k(x)\} \dd{x} +\end{aligned}$$ + +Where we have used the definition of an adjoint operator. +We would like to rewrite this: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \hat{L}{}^\dagger \{\pi k\} + = -\nabla \cdot \big( \vb{u} \pi k - D \nabla(\pi k) \big) + = -\nabla \cdot (\vb{u} \pi k - D k \nabla \pi - D \pi \nabla k) +\end{aligned}$$ + +Since $\pi$ is stationary by definition, +we know that $\nabla \cdot (\vb{u} \pi - D \nabla \pi) = 0$, +meaning: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \hat{L}{}^\dagger \{\pi k\} + = \nabla \cdot (D \pi \nabla k) + = \nabla \pi \cdot (D \nabla k) + \pi \nabla \cdot (D \nabla k) +\end{aligned}$$ + +Detailed balance demands that $\vb{u} \pi = D \nabla \pi$, +leading to the following: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \hat{L}{}^\dagger \{\pi k\} + &= D \nabla \pi \cdot \nabla k + \pi \nabla \cdot (D \nabla k) + = \pi \vb{u} \cdot \nabla k + \pi \nabla \cdot (D \nabla k) + \\ + &= \pi \big( \vb{u} \cdot \nabla k + \nabla \cdot (D \nabla k) \big) + = \pi \hat{L}\{k\} +\end{aligned}$$ + +Where we recognized the definition of $\hat{L}$ +from the backward Kolmogorov equation. +Now that we have established that $\hat{L}{}^\dagger\{\pi k\} = \pi \hat{L}\{k\}$, +we return to the inner product: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \braket*{\hat{L} h}{k}_\pi + = \int_{-\infty}^\infty h(x) \: \pi(x) \: \hat{L}\{k(x)\} \dd{x} + = \braket*{h}{\hat{L} k}_\pi +\end{aligned}$$ + +Consequently, the following weighted inner products must also be equivalent: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \braket{\exp\!(t \hat{L}) h}{k}_\pi + = \braket{h}{\exp\!(t \hat{L}) k}_\pi +\end{aligned}$$ + +Now, consider the time evolution of the +[conditional expectation](/know/concept/conditional-expectation/) +$\mathbf{E}\big[ k(X_t) | X_0 \big]$: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \pdv{t} \mathbf{E}\big[ k(X_t) | X_0 \big] + &= \pdv{t} \int_{-\infty}^\infty k(x) \: \phi(t, x) \dd{x} + = \int_{-\infty}^\infty k \pdv{\phi}{t} \dd{x} + \\ + &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty k \: \hat{L}{}^\dagger\{\phi\} \dd{x} + = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \hat{L}\{k\} \: \phi \dd{x} + = \mathbf{E}\big[ \hat{L}\{k(X_t)\} | X_0 \big] +\end{aligned}$$ + +Where we used the forward Kolmogorov equation +and the definition of an adjoint operator. +Therefore, since the expectation $\mathbf{E}$ +does not explicitly depend on $t$ (only implicitly via $X_t$), +we can naively move the differentiation inside +(only valid within $\mathbf{E}$): + +$$\begin{aligned} + \pdv{t} \mathbf{E}\big[ k(X_t) | X_0 \big] + = \mathbf{E}\bigg[ \pdv{k(X_t)}{t} \bigg| X_0 \bigg] + = \mathbf{E}\bigg[ \hat{L}\{k(X_0)\} \bigg| X_0 \bigg] +\end{aligned}$$ + +A differential equation of the form $\pdv*{k}{t} = \hat{L}\{k(t, x)\}$ +for a time-independent operator $\hat{L}$ +has a general solution $k(t, x) = \exp\!(t \hat{L})\{k(0,x)\}$, +therefore: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \mathbf{E}\big[ k(X_t) \big| X_0 \big] + = \mathbf{E}\big[ \exp\!(t \hat{L})\{k(X_0)\} \big| X_0 \big] + = \exp\!(t \hat{L})\{k(X_0)\} +\end{aligned}$$ + +With this, we can evaluate the two weighted inner products from earlier, +which we know are equal to each other. +Using the *tower property* of the conditional expectation: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \braket{h}{\exp\!(t \hat{L}) k}_\pi + &= \mathbf{E}\big[ h(X_0) \: \mathbf{E}[k(X_t) | X_0] \big] + = \mathbf{E}\big[ h(X_0) \: k(X_t) \big] + \\ + = \braket{\exp\!(t \hat{L}) h}{k}_\pi + &= \mathbf{E}\big[ \mathbf{E}[h(X_t) | X_0] \: k(X_0) \big] + = \mathbf{E}\big[ h(X_t) \: k(X_0) \big] +\end{aligned}$$ + +Where the integral gave the expectation value at $X_0$, +since $\pi$ does not change in time. +</div> +</div> + + + +## References +1. U.H. Thygesen, + *Lecture notes on diffusions and stochastic differential equations*, + 2021, Polyteknisk Kompendie. |