diff options
| author | Prefetch | 2021-10-02 15:40:20 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Prefetch | 2021-10-02 15:40:20 +0200 |
| commit | dedb366c3a78f61c64f6be627ea091e71e009f7d (patch) | |
| tree | 289f46d1d5176aa0e2ae210f973d23039a8f3c6c /content/know/concept/fabry-perot-cavity/index.pdc | |
| parent | f7c7464e29cb19083a2488c393f3707e97248c4f (diff) | |
Expand knowledge base
Diffstat (limited to 'content/know/concept/fabry-perot-cavity/index.pdc')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/know/concept/fabry-perot-cavity/index.pdc | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/know/concept/fabry-perot-cavity/index.pdc b/content/know/concept/fabry-perot-cavity/index.pdc index 2f1f84f..d40852f 100644 --- a/content/know/concept/fabry-perot-cavity/index.pdc +++ b/content/know/concept/fabry-perot-cavity/index.pdc @@ -120,6 +120,12 @@ $$\begin{aligned} &= (1 - r_R) B_m \exp\!\big( i (\tilde{n}_C \!-\! \tilde{n}_R) \tilde{k}_m L/2 \big) \end{aligned}$$ +Note that we have not demanded continuity of the electric field. +This is because the mirrors are infinitely thin "magic" planes; +if we had instead used a full physical mirror structure, +then the we would have demanded continuity, +as you might have expected. + ## References |