diff options
author | Prefetch | 2021-07-01 22:21:26 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Prefetch | 2021-07-01 22:21:26 +0200 |
commit | 805718880c936d778c99fe0d5cfdb238342a83c7 (patch) | |
tree | 194d1cd1a3c21600dfa5371d6935dbc2bfd12c5c /content/know/concept/landau-quantization | |
parent | f9cce7d563d0ea2ac591c31ff7d248ad3d02d1ac (diff) |
Expand knowledge base
Diffstat (limited to 'content/know/concept/landau-quantization')
-rw-r--r-- | content/know/concept/landau-quantization/index.pdc | 127 |
1 files changed, 127 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/know/concept/landau-quantization/index.pdc b/content/know/concept/landau-quantization/index.pdc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4212078 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/know/concept/landau-quantization/index.pdc @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +--- +title: "Landau quantization" +firstLetter: "L" +publishDate: 2021-07-01 +categories: +- Physics +- Quantum mechanics + +date: 2021-07-01T18:44:30+02:00 +draft: false +markup: pandoc +--- + +# Landau quantization + +When a particle with charge $q$ is moving in a homogeneous magnetic field, +quantum mechanics decrees that its allowed energies split +into degenerate discrete **Landau levels**, +a phenomenon known as **Landau quantization**. + +Starting from the Hamiltonian $\hat{H}$ for a particle with mass $m$ +in a vector potential $\vec{A}(\hat{Q})$: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \hat{H} + &= \frac{1}{2 m} \big( \hat{p} - q \vec{A} \big)^2 +\end{aligned}$$ + +We choose $\vec{A} = (- \hat{y} B, 0, 0)$, +yielding a magnetic field $\vec{B} = \nabla \times \vec{A}$ +pointing in the $z$-direction with strength $B$. +The Hamiltonian becomes: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \hat{H} + &= \frac{\big( \hat{p}_x - q B \hat{y} \big)^2}{2 m} + \frac{\hat{p}_y^2}{2 m} + \frac{\hat{p}_z^2}{2 m} +\end{aligned}$$ + +The only position operator occurring in $\hat{H}$ is $\hat{y}$, +so $[\hat{H}, \hat{p}_x] = [\hat{H}, \hat{p}_z] = 0$. +Because $\hat{p}_z$ appears in an unmodified kinetic energy term, +and the corresponding $\hat{z}$ does not occur at all, +the particle has completely free motion in the $z$-direction. +Likewise, because $\hat{x}$ does not occur in $\hat{H}$, +we can replace $\hat{p}_x$ by its eigenvalue $\hbar k_x$, +although the motion is not free, due to $q B \hat{y}$. + +Based on the absence of $\hat{x}$ and $\hat{z}$, +we make the following ansatz for the wavefunction $\Psi$: +a plane wave in the $x$ and $z$ directions, multiplied by an unknown $\phi(y)$: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \Psi(x, y, z) + = \phi(y) \exp(i k_x x + i k_z z) +\end{aligned}$$ + +Inserting this into the time-independent Schrödinger equation gives, +after dividing out the plane wave exponential $\exp(i k_x x + i k_z z)$: + +$$\begin{aligned} + E \phi + &= \frac{1}{2 m} \Big( (\hbar k_x - q B y)^2 + \hat{p}_y^2 + \hbar^2 k_z^2 \Big) \phi +\end{aligned}$$ + +By defining the cyclotron frequency $\omega_c \equiv q B / m$ and rearranging, +we can turn this into a 1D quantum harmonic oscillator in $y$, +with a couple of extra terms: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \Big( E - \frac{\hbar^2 k_z^2}{2 m} \Big) \phi + &= \bigg( \frac{1}{2} m \omega_c^2 \Big( y - \frac{\hbar k_x}{m \omega_c} \Big)^2 + \frac{\hat{p}_y^2}{2 m} \bigg) \phi +\end{aligned}$$ + +The potential minimum is shifted by $y_0 = \hbar k_x / (m \omega_c)$, +and a plane wave in $z$ contributes to the energy $E$. +In any case, the energy levels of this type of system are well-known: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \boxed{ + E_n = \hbar \omega_c \Big(n + \frac{1}{2}\Big) + \frac{\hbar^2 k_z^2}{2 m} + } +\end{aligned}$$ + +And $\Psi_n$ is then as follows, +where $\phi$ is the known quantum harmonic oscillator solution: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \Psi_n(x, y, z) + = \phi_n(y - y_0) \exp(i k_x x + i k_z z) +\end{aligned}$$ + +Note that this wave function contains $k_x$ (also inside $y_0$), +but $k_x$ is absent from the energy $E_n$. +This implies degeneracy: +assuming periodic boundary conditions $\Psi(x\!+\!L_x) = \Psi(x)$, +then $k_x$ can take values of the form $2 \pi n / L_x$, for $n \in \mathbb{Z}$. + +However, $k_x$ also occurs in the definition of $y_0$, so the degeneracy +is finite, since $y_0$ must still lie inside the system, +or, more formally, $y_0 \in [0, L_y]$: + +$$\begin{aligned} + 0 \le y_0 = \frac{\hbar k_x}{m \omega_c} = \frac{\hbar 2 \pi n}{q B L_x} \le L_y +\end{aligned}$$ + +Isolating this for $n$, we find the following upper bound of the degeneracy: + +$$\begin{aligned} + \boxed{ + n \le + \frac{q B L_x L_y}{2 \pi \hbar} = \frac{q B A}{h} + } +\end{aligned}$$ + +Where $A \equiv L_x L_y$ is the area of the confinement in the $(x,y)$-plane. +Evidently, the degeneracy of each level increases with larger $B$, +but since $\omega_c = q B / m$, the energy gap between each level increases too. +In other words: the [density of states](/know/concept/density-of-states/) +is a constant with respect to the energy, +but the states get distributed across the $E_n$ differently depending on $B$. + + + +## References +1. L.E. Ballentine, + *Quantum mechanics: a modern development*, 2nd edition, + World Scientific. |