1 files changed, 54 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/know/concept/slater-determinant/index.pdc b/content/know/concept/slater-determinant/index.pdc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8bc4291
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/know/concept/slater-determinant/index.pdc
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+---
+title: "Slater determinant"
+firstLetter: "S"
+publishDate: 2021-02-22
+categories:
+- Quantum mechanics
+- Physics
+
+date: 2021-02-22T21:38:03+01:00
+draft: false
+markup: pandoc
+---
+
+# Slater determinant
+
+In quantum mechanics, the **Slater determinant** is a trick
+to create a many-particle wave function for a system of $N$ fermions,
+with the necessary antisymmetry.
+
+Given an orthogonal set of individual states $\psi_n(x)$, we write
+$\psi_n(x_n)$ to say that particle $x_n$ is in state $\psi_n$. Now the
+goal is to find an expression for an overall many-particle wave
+function $\Psi(x_1, ..., x_N)$ that satisfies the
+[Pauli exclusion principle](/know/concept/pauli-exclusion-principle/).
+Enter the Slater determinant:
+
+$$\begin{aligned}
+    \boxed{
+        \Psi(x_1, ..., x_N)
+        = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N!}} \det\!
+        \begin{bmatrix}
+            \psi_1(x_1) & \cdots & \psi_N(x_1) \\
+            \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
+            \psi_1(x_N) & \cdots & \psi_N(x_N)
+        \end{bmatrix}
+    }\end{aligned}$$
+
+Swapping the state of two particles corresponds to exchanging two rows,
+which flips the sign of the determinant.
+Similarly, switching two columns means swapping two states,
+which also results in a sign change.
+Finally, putting two particles into the same state makes $\Psi$ vanish.
+
+Not all valid many-fermion wave functions can be
+written as a single Slater determinant; a linear combination of multiple
+may be needed. Nevertheless, an appropriate choice of the input set
+$\psi_n(x)$ can optimize how well a single determinant approximates a
+given $\Psi$.
+
+In fact, there exists a similar trick for bosons, where the goal is to
+create a symmetric wave function which allows multiple particles to
+occupy the same state. In this case, one needs to take the **Slater
+permanent** of the same matrix, which is simply the determinant, but with
+all minuses replaced by pluses.