1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
---
title: "Electric field"
firstLetter: "E"
publishDate: 2021-07-12
categories:
- Physics
- Electromagnetism
date: 2021-07-12T09:46:25+02:00
draft: false
markup: pandoc
---
## Electric field
The **electric field** $\vb{E}$ is a vector field
that describes electric effects,
and is defined as the field that correctly predicts
the [Lorentz force](/know/concept/lorentz-force/)
on a particle with electric charge $q$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{F}
= q \vb{E}
\end{aligned}$$
This definition implies that the direction of $\vb{E}$
is from positive to negative charges,
since opposite charges attracts and like charges repel.
If two opposite point charges with magnitude $q$
are observed from far away,
they can be treated as a single object called a **dipole**,
which has an **electric dipole moment** $\vb{p}$ defined like so,
where $\vb{d}$ is the vector going from
the negative to the positive charge (opposite direction of $\vb{E}$):
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{p} = q \vb{d}
\end{aligned}$$
Alternatively, for consistency with [magnetic fields](/know/concept/magnetic-field/),
$\vb{p}$ can be defined from the aligning torque $\vb{\tau}$
experienced by the dipole when placed in an $\vb{E}$-field.
In other words, $\vb{p}$ satisfies:
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{\tau} = \vb{p} \times \vb{E}
\end{aligned}$$
Where $\vb{p}$ has units of $\mathrm{C m}$.
The **polarization density** $\vb{P}$ is defined from $\vb{p}$,
and roughly speaking represents the moments per unit volume:
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{P} \equiv \dv{\vb{p}}{V}
\:\:\iff\:\:
\vb{p} = \int_V \vb{P} \dd{V}
\end{aligned}$$
If $\vb{P}$ has the same magnitude and direction throughout the body,
then this becomes $\vb{p} = \vb{P} V$, where $V$ is the volume.
Therefore, $\vb{P}$ has units of $\mathrm{C / m^2}$.
A nonzero $\vb{P}$ complicates things,
since it contributes to the field and hence modifies $\vb{E}$.
We thus define
the "free" **displacement field** $\vb{D}$
from the "bound" field $\vb{P}$
and the "net" field $\vb{E}$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{D} \equiv \varepsilon_0 \vb{E} + \vb{P}
\:\:\iff\:\:
\vb{E} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0} (\vb{D} - \vb{P})
\end{aligned}$$
Where the **electric permittivity of free space** $\varepsilon_0$ is a known constant.
It is important to point out some inconsistencies here:
$\vb{D}$ and $\vb{P}$ contain a factor of $\varepsilon_0$,
and therefore measure **flux density**,
while $\vb{E}$ does not contain $\varepsilon_0$,
and thus measures **field intensity**.
Note that this convention is the opposite
of the magnetic analogues $\vb{B}$, $\vb{H}$ and $\vb{M}$,
and that $\vb{M}$ has the opposite sign of $\vb{P}$.
The polarization $\vb{P}$ is a function of $\vb{E}$.
In addition to the inherent polarity
of the material $\vb{P}_0$ (zero in most cases),
there is a (possibly nonlinear) response
to the applied $\vb{E}$-field:
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{P} =
\vb{P}_0 + \varepsilon_0 \chi_e^{(1)} \vb{E}
+ \varepsilon_0 \chi_e^{(2)} |\vb{E}| \: \vb{E}
+ \varepsilon_0 \chi_e^{(3)} |\vb{E}|^2 \: \vb{E} + ...
\end{aligned}$$
Where the $\chi_e^{(n)}$ are the **electric susceptibilities** of the medium.
For simplicity, we often assume that only the $n\!=\!1$ term is nonzero,
which is the linear response to $\vb{E}$.
In that case, we define the **absolute permittivity** $\varepsilon$ so that:
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{D}
= \varepsilon_0 \vb{E} + \vb{P}
= \varepsilon_0 \vb{E} + \varepsilon_0 \chi_e^{(1)} \vb{E}
= \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_r \vb{E}
= \varepsilon \vb{E}
\end{aligned}$$
I.e. $\varepsilon \equiv \varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0$,
where $\varepsilon_r \equiv 1 + \chi_e^{(1)}$ is
the [**dielectric function**](/know/concept/dielectric-function/)
or **relative permittivity**,
whose calculation is of great interest in physics.
In reality, a material cannot respond instantly to $\vb{E}$,
meaning that $\chi_e^{(1)}$ is a function of time,
and that $\vb{P}$ is the convolution of $\chi_e^{(1)}(t)$ and $\vb{E}(t)$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\vb{P}(t)
= \varepsilon_0 \big(\chi_e^{(1)} * \vb{E}\big)(t)
= \varepsilon_0 \int_{-\infty}^\infty \chi_e^{(1)}(t - \tau) \: \vb{E}(\tau) \:d\tau
\end{aligned}$$
Note that this definition requires $\chi_e^{(1)}(t) = 0$ for $t < 0$
in order to ensure causality,
which leads to the [Kramers-Kronig relations](/know/concept/kramers-kronig-relations/).
|
