1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
|
---
title: "Fredholm alternative"
firstLetter: "F"
publishDate: 2021-05-29
categories:
- Mathematics
date: 2021-03-09T20:36:01+01:00
draft: false
markup: pandoc
---
# Fredholm alternative
The **Fredholm alternative** is a theorem regarding equations involving
a linear operator $\hat{L}$ on a [Hilbert space](/know/concept/hilbert-space/),
and is useful in the context of multiple-scale perturbation theory.
It is an *alternative* because it gives two mutually exclusive options,
given here in [Dirac notation](/know/concept/dirac-notation/):
1. $\hat{L} \ket{u} = \ket{f}$ has a unique solution $\ket{u}$ for every $\ket{f}$.
2. $\hat{L}^\dagger \ket{w} = 0$ has non-zero solutions.
Then regarding $\hat{L} \ket{u} = \ket{f}$:
1. If $\braket{w}{f} = 0$ for all $\ket{w}$, then it has infinitely many solutions $\ket{u}$.
2. If $\braket{w}{f} \neq 0$ for any $\ket{w}$, then it has no solutions $\ket{u}$.
Where $\hat{L}^\dagger$ is the adjoint of $\hat{L}$.
In other words, $\hat{L} \ket{u} = \ket{f}$ has non-trivial solutions if
and only if for all $\ket{w}$ (including the trivial case $\ket{w} = 0$)
it holds that $\braket{w}{f} = 0$.
As a specific example,
if $\hat{L}$ is a matrix and the kets are vectors,
this theorem can alternatively be stated as follows using the determinant:
1. If $\mathrm{det}(\hat{L}) \neq 0$, then $\hat{L} \vec{u} = \vec{f}$
has a unique solution $\vec{u}$ for every $\vec{f}$.
2. If $\mathrm{det}(\hat{L}) = 0$,
then $\hat{L}^\dagger \vec{w} = \vec{0}$ has non-zero solutions.
Then regarding $\hat{L} \vec{u} = \vec{f}$:
1. If $\vec{w} \cdot \vec{f} = 0$ for all $\vec{w}$, then it has
infinitely many solutions $\vec{u}$.
2. If $\vec{w} \cdot \vec{f} \neq 0$ for any $\vec{w}$, then it has
no solutions $\vec{u}$.
Consequently, the Fredholm alternative is also brought up
in the context of eigenvalue problems.
Define $\hat{M} = (\hat{L} - \lambda \hat{I})$,
where $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $\hat{L}$
if and only if $\mathrm{det}(\hat{M}) = 0$.
Then for the equation $\hat{M} \ket{u} = \ket{f}$, we can say that:
1. If $\lambda$ is *not* an eigenvalue,
then there is a unique solution $\ket{u}$ for each $\ket{f}$.
2. If $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue, then $\hat{M}^\dagger \ket{w} = 0$
has non-zero solutions. Then:
1. If $\braket{w}{f} = 0$ for all $\ket{w}$, then there are
infinitely many solutions $\ket{u}$.
2. If $\braket{w}{f} \neq 0$ for any $\ket{w}$, then there are no
solutions $\ket{u}$.
## References
1. O. Bang,
*Nonlinear mathematical physics: lecture notes*, 2020,
unpublished.
|
