diff options
| author | Prefetch | 2026-09-03 15:05:35 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Prefetch | 2026-09-03 15:05:35 +0200 |
| commit | 29b49508a751649310173e592b63415dbf563a2a (patch) | |
| tree | 70f732ee556f55746e713eae8adc026585ce04b2 /source/know/concept/rutherford-scattering/index.md | |
| parent | b7b66878b3699ddb0a495c6ba91b83ecee3362d8 (diff) | |
Improve knowledge base
Diffstat (limited to 'source/know/concept/rutherford-scattering/index.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/know/concept/rutherford-scattering/index.md | 70 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/source/know/concept/rutherford-scattering/index.md b/source/know/concept/rutherford-scattering/index.md index edf391c..7a2a1f2 100644 --- a/source/know/concept/rutherford-scattering/index.md +++ b/source/know/concept/rutherford-scattering/index.md @@ -27,13 +27,13 @@ Intuitively, we expect $$\theta$$ to be larger for smaller $$b$$. By combining Coulomb's law with Newton's laws, these particles' equations of motion are found to be as follows, -where $$r = |\vb{r}_1 - \vb{r}_2|$$ is the distance between 1 and 2: +where $$r \equiv |\vb{r}_1 \!-\! \vb{r}_2|$$ is the distance between 1 and 2: $$\begin{aligned} m_1 \dv{\vb{v}_1}{t} = \vb{F}_1 = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{\vb{r}_1 - \vb{r}_2}{r^3} - \qquad \quad + \qquad \qquad m_2 \dv{\vb{v}_2}{t} = \vb{F}_2 = - \vb{F}_1 @@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ $$(r, \varphi, z)$$: $$\begin{aligned} \vb{r} - = r \cos{\varphi} \:\vu{e}_x + r \sin{\varphi} \:\vu{e}_y + z \:\vu{e}_z - = r \:\vu{e}_r + z \:\vu{e}_z + &= r \cos{\varphi} \:\vu{e}_x + r \sin{\varphi} \:\vu{e}_y + z \:\vu{e}_z + \\ + &= r \:\vu{e}_r + z \:\vu{e}_z \end{aligned}$$ These new coordinates are sketched below, @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ we can find $$\vb{v}$$ by differentiating with respect to time: $$\begin{aligned} \vb{v} + = \vb{r}' &= \big( r' \cos{\varphi} - r \varphi' \sin{\varphi} \big) \:\vu{e}_x + \big( r' \sin{\varphi} + r \varphi' \cos{\varphi} \big) \:\vu{e}_y + z' \:\vu{e}_z \\ @@ -107,32 +109,34 @@ $$\begin{aligned} = \mu r^2 \varphi' \:\vu{e}_z \end{aligned}$$ -Now, from the figure above, -we can argue geometrically that at infinity $$t = \pm \infty$$, -the ratio $$b/r$$ is related to the angle $$\chi$$ between $$\vb{v}$$ and $$\vb{r}$$ like so: +Now, in the figure above, imagine a right-angled triangle +with hypotenuse $$\vb{r}$$ and short side $$b$$. +When $$t \to +\infty$$, trigonometry tells us the following, +where $$\chi$$ is the final angle between $$\vb{v}$$ and $$\vb{r}$$: $$\begin{aligned} - \frac{b}{r(\pm \infty)} - = \sin{\chi(\pm \infty)} - \qquad \quad - \chi(t) - \equiv \measuredangle(\vb{r}, \vb{v}) + \lim_{t \to +\infty} \frac{b}{r(t)} + = \sin{\chi} + \qquad \qquad + \chi + \equiv + \lim_{t \to +\infty} \measuredangle(\vb{r}(t), \vb{v}(t)) \end{aligned}$$ -With this, we can rewrite -the magnitude of the angular momentum $$\vb{L}$$ as follows, -where the total velocity $$|\vb{v}|$$ is a constant, -thanks to conservation of energy: +With this, we can rewrite the magnitude of the angular momentum $$\vb{L}$$ as follows, +where the relative speed $$|\vb{v}|$$ is a constant thanks to energy conservation: $$\begin{aligned} - \big| \vb{L}(\pm \infty) \big| - = \mu \big| \vb{r} \cross \vb{v} \big| + \lim_{t \to +\infty} + \big| \vb{L}(t) \big| = \mu r |\vb{v}| \sin{\chi} = \mu b |\vb{v}| \end{aligned}$$ -However, conveniently, -angular momentum is also conserved, i.e. $$\vb{L}$$ is constant in time: +This is useful, because angular momentum is conserved, +i.e. $$\vb{L}$$ is constant in time. +We prove this by using the product rule of differentiation, +and replacing $$\mu \vb{v}'$$ with the reduced equation of motion: $$\begin{aligned} \vb{L}'(t) @@ -142,8 +146,8 @@ $$\begin{aligned} = 0 \end{aligned}$$ -Where we have replaced $$\mu \vb{v}'$$ with the equation of motion. -Thanks to this, we can equate the two preceding expressions for $$\vb{L}$$, +Thanks to this, we can equate the two preceding expressions +for the magnitude $$|\vb{L}|$$, leading to the relation below. Note the appearance of a new minus, because the sketch shows that $$\varphi' < 0$$, @@ -178,8 +182,8 @@ $$\begin{aligned} = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 b |\vb{v}|} \dd{(\cos{\varphi})} \end{aligned}$$ -Integrating this from the initial state $$i$$ at $$t = -\infty$$ -to the final state $$f$$ at $$t = \infty$$ yields: +Integrating this from the initial state $$i$$ at $$t \to -\infty$$ +to the final state $$f$$ at $$t \to +\infty$$ yields: $$\begin{aligned} \Delta v_y @@ -187,18 +191,18 @@ $$\begin{aligned} = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 b |\vb{v}| \mu} \big( \cos{\varphi_f} - \cos{\varphi_i} \big) \end{aligned}$$ -From symmetry, we see that $$\varphi_i = \pi \!-\! \varphi_f$$, -and that $$\Delta v_y = v_{y,f} \!-\! v_{y,i} = 2 v_{y,f}$$, such that: +From symmetry, we see that $$\Delta v_y = v_{y,f} \!-\! v_{y,i} = 2 v_{y,f}$$, +and that $$\varphi_i = \pi \!-\! \varphi_f$$, such that: $$\begin{aligned} - 2 v_{y,f} + \Delta v_y + = 2 v_{y,f} = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 b |\vb{v}| \mu} \big( \cos{\varphi_f} - \cos(\pi \!-\! \varphi_f) \big) = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 b |\vb{v}| \mu} \big( 2 \cos{\varphi_f} \big) \end{aligned}$$ -Furthermore, geometrically, at $$t = \infty$$ -we notice that $$v_{y,f} = |\vb{v}| \sin{\varphi_f}$$, -leading to: +Furthermore, geometrically for $$t \to +\infty$$ +we notice that $$v_{y,f} = |\vb{v}| \sin{\varphi_f}$$, leading to: $$\begin{aligned} 2 |\vb{v}| \sin{\varphi_f} @@ -206,7 +210,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned} \end{aligned}$$ Rearranging this yields the following equation -for the final polar angle $$\varphi_f \equiv \varphi(\infty)$$: +for the final polar angle $$\varphi_f$$: $$\begin{aligned} \tan{\varphi_f} @@ -214,14 +218,14 @@ $$\begin{aligned} = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 b |\vb{v}|^2 \mu} \end{aligned}$$ -However, we want $$\theta$$, not $$\varphi_f$$. +However, we want the deflection angle $$\theta$$, not $$\varphi_f$$. One last use of symmetry and geometry tells us that $$\theta = 2 \varphi_f$$, and we thus arrive at the celebrated **Rutherford scattering formula**: $$\begin{aligned} \boxed{ - \tan\!\Big( \frac{\theta}{2} \Big) + \tan\!\bigg( \frac{\theta}{2} \bigg) = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 b |\vb{v}|^2 \mu} } \end{aligned}$$ |
