summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'source/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer')
-rw-r--r--source/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer/index.md34
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/source/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer/index.md b/source/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer/index.md
index fd4af57..de80f96 100644
--- a/source/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer/index.md
+++ b/source/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer/index.md
@@ -12,15 +12,15 @@ layout: "concept"
In fluid dynamics, the **Blasius boundary layer** is an application of
the [Prandtl equations](/know/concept/prandtl-equations/),
which govern the flow of a fluid
-at large Reynolds number $\mathrm{Re} \gg 1$
+at large Reynolds number $$\mathrm{Re} \gg 1$$
close to a surface.
Specifically, the Blasius layer is the solution
for a half-plane approached from the edge by a fluid.
-A fluid with velocity field $\va{v} = U \vu{e}_x$ flows to the plane,
-which starts at $y = 0$ and exists for $x \ge 0$.
+A fluid with velocity field $$\va{v} = U \vu{e}_x$$ flows to the plane,
+which starts at $$y = 0$$ and exists for $$x \ge 0$$.
To describe this, we make an ansatz
-for the *slip-flow* region's $x$-velocity $v_x(x, y)$:
+for the *slip-flow* region's $$x$$-velocity $$v_x(x, y)$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
v_x
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ $$\begin{aligned}
\equiv \frac{y}{\delta(x)}
\end{aligned}$$
-Note that $f'(s)$ is the derivative of an unknown $f(s)$,
-and that it obeys the boundary conditions $f'(0) = 0$ and $f'(\infty) = 1$.
-Furthermore, $\delta(x)$ is the thickness of the stationary boundary layer at the surface.
+Note that $$f'(s)$$ is the derivative of an unknown $$f(s)$$,
+and that it obeys the boundary conditions $$f'(0) = 0$$ and $$f'(\infty) = 1$$.
+Furthermore, $$\delta(x)$$ is the thickness of the stationary boundary layer at the surface.
To derive the Prandtl equations,
-the estimate $\delta(x) = \sqrt{\nu x / U}$ was used,
+the estimate $$\delta(x) = \sqrt{\nu x / U}$$ was used,
which we will stick with.
-For later use, it is worth writing the derivatives of $s$:
+For later use, it is worth writing the derivatives of $$s$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\pdv{s}{x}
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned}
= \frac{1}{\delta}
\end{aligned}$$
-Inserting the ansatz for $v_x$ into the incompressibility condition then yields:
+Inserting the ansatz for $$v_x$$ into the incompressibility condition then yields:
$$\begin{aligned}
\pdv{v_y}{y}
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned}
= U s f'' \frac{\delta'}{\delta}
\end{aligned}$$
-Which we integrate to get an expression for the $y$-velocity $v_y$, namely:
+Which we integrate to get an expression for the $$y$$-velocity $$v_y$$, namely:
$$\begin{aligned}
v_y
@@ -64,21 +64,21 @@ $$\begin{aligned}
\end{aligned}$$
Now, consider the main Prandtl equation,
-assuming that the attack velocity $U$ is constant:
+assuming that the attack velocity $$U$$ is constant:
$$\begin{aligned}
v_x \pdv{v_x}{x} + v_y \pdv{v_x}{y}
= \nu \pdvn{2}{v_x}{y}
\end{aligned}$$
-Inserting our expressions for $v_x$ and $v_y$ into this leads us to:
+Inserting our expressions for $$v_x$$ and $$v_y$$ into this leads us to:
$$\begin{aligned}
- U^2 \frac{\delta'}{\delta} s f'' f' + U^2 \frac{\delta'}{\delta} f'' (s f' - f)
= \nu U \frac{1}{\delta^2} f'''
\end{aligned}$$
-After multiplying it by $\delta^2 / U$ and cancelling out some terms,
+After multiplying it by $$\delta^2 / U$$ and cancelling out some terms,
it reduces to:
$$\begin{aligned}
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned}
= 0
\end{aligned}$$
-Then, substituting $\delta(x) = \sqrt{\nu x / U}$ and $\delta'(x) = (1/2) \sqrt{\nu / (U x)}$ yields:
+Then, substituting $$\delta(x) = \sqrt{\nu x / U}$$ and $$\delta'(x) = (1/2) \sqrt{\nu / (U x)}$$ yields:
$$\begin{aligned}
\nu f''' + U \frac{\nu}{2 U} f'' f
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned}
\end{aligned}$$
Simplifying this leads us to the **Blasius equation**,
-which is a nonlinear ODE for $f(s)$:
+which is a nonlinear ODE for $$f(s)$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\boxed{
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ $$\begin{aligned}
\end{aligned}$$
Unfortunately, this cannot be solved analytically, only numerically.
-Nevertheless, the result shows a boundary layer $\delta(x)$
+Nevertheless, the result shows a boundary layer $$\delta(x)$$
exhibiting the expected downstream thickening.