1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
---
title: "Density operator"
date: 2021-03-03
categories:
- Physics
- Quantum mechanics
layout: "concept"
---
In quantum mechanics, the expectation value of an observable
$\expval{\hat{L}}$ represents the average result from measuring
$\hat{L}$ on a large number of systems (an **ensemble**)
prepared in the same state $\Ket{\Psi}$,
known as a **pure ensemble** or (somewhat confusingly) **pure state**.
But what if the systems of the ensemble are not all in the same state?
To work with such a **mixed ensemble** or **mixed state**,
the **density operator** $\hat{\rho}$ or **density matrix** (in a basis) is useful.
It is defined as follows, where $p_n$ is the probability
that the system is in state $\Ket{\Psi_n}$,
i.e. the proportion of systems in the ensemble that are
in state $\Ket{\Psi_n}$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\boxed{
\hat{\rho}
= \sum_{n} p_n \Ket{\Psi_n} \Bra{\Psi_n}
}
\end{aligned}$$
Do not let is this form fool you into thinking that $\hat{\rho}$ is diagonal:
$\Ket{\Psi_n}$ need not be basis vectors.
Instead, the matrix elements of $\hat{\rho}$ are found as usual,
where $\Ket{j}$ and $\Ket{k}$ are basis vectors:
$$\begin{aligned}
\matrixel{j}{\hat{\rho}}{k}
= \sum_{n} p_n \Inprod{j}{\Psi_n} \Inprod{\Psi_n}{k}
\end{aligned}$$
However, from the special case where $\Ket{\Psi_n}$ are indeed basis vectors,
we can conclude that $\hat{\rho}$ is positive semidefinite and Hermitian,
and that its trace (i.e. the total probability) is 100%:
$$\begin{gathered}
\boxed{
\hat{\rho} \ge 0
}
\qquad \qquad
\boxed{
\hat{\rho}^\dagger = \hat{\rho}
}
\qquad \qquad
\boxed{
\mathrm{Tr}(\hat{\rho}) = 1
}
\end{gathered}$$
These properties are preserved by all changes of basis.
If the ensemble is purely $\Ket{\Psi}$,
then $\hat{\rho}$ is given by a single state vector:
$$\begin{aligned}
\hat{\rho} = \Ket{\Psi} \Bra{\Psi}
\end{aligned}$$
From the special case where $\Ket{\Psi}$ is a basis vector,
we can conclude that for a pure ensemble,
$\hat{\rho}$ is idempotent, which means that:
$$\begin{aligned}
\hat{\rho}^2 = \hat{\rho}
\end{aligned}$$
This can be used to find out whether a given $\hat{\rho}$
represents a pure or mixed ensemble.
Next, we define the ensemble average $\expval{\hat{O}}$
as the mean of the expectation values of $\hat{O}$ for states in the ensemble.
We use the same notation as for the pure expectation value,
since this is only a small extension of the concept to mixed ensembles.
It is calculated like so:
$$\begin{aligned}
\boxed{
\expval{\hat{O}}
= \sum_{n} p_n \matrixel{\Psi_n}{\hat{O}}{\Psi_n}
= \mathrm{Tr}(\hat{\rho} \hat{O})
}
\end{aligned}$$
To prove the latter,
we write out the trace $\mathrm{Tr}$ as the sum of the diagonal elements, so:
$$\begin{aligned}
\mathrm{Tr}(\hat{\rho} \hat{O})
&= \sum_{j} \matrixel{j}{\hat{\rho} \hat{O}}{j}
= \sum_{j} \sum_{n} p_n \Inprod{j}{\Psi_n} \matrixel{\Psi_n}{\hat{O}}{j}
\\
&= \sum_{n} \sum_{j} p_n\matrixel{\Psi_n}{\hat{O}}{j} \Inprod{j}{\Psi_n}
= \sum_{n} p_n \matrixel{\Psi_n}{\hat{O} \hat{I}}{\Psi_n}
= \expval{\hat{O}}
\end{aligned}$$
In both the pure and mixed cases,
if the state probabilities $p_n$ are constant with respect to time,
then the evolution of the ensemble obeys the **Von Neumann equation**:
$$\begin{aligned}
\boxed{
i \hbar \dv{\hat{\rho}}{t} = \comm{\hat{H}}{\hat{\rho}}
}
\end{aligned}$$
This equivalent to the Schrödinger equation:
one can be derived from the other.
We differentiate $\hat{\rho}$ with the product rule,
and then substitute the opposite side of the Schrödinger equation:
$$\begin{aligned}
i \hbar \dv{\hat{\rho}}{t}
&= i \hbar \dv{}{t}\sum_n p_n \Ket{\Psi_n} \Bra{\Psi_n}
\\
&= \sum_n p_n \Big( i \hbar \dv{}{t}\Ket{\Psi_n} \Big) \Bra{\Psi_n} + \sum_n p_n \Ket{\Psi_n} \Big( i \hbar \dv{}{t}\Bra{\Psi_n} \Big)
\\
&= \sum_n p_n \ket{\hat{H} n} \Bra{n} - \sum_n p_n \Ket{n} \bra{\hat{H} n}
= \hat{H} \hat{\rho} - \hat{\rho} \hat{H}
= \comm{\hat{H}}{\hat{\rho}}
\end{aligned}$$
|
