1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
|
---
title: "Prandtl equations"
sort_title: "Prandtl equations"
date: 2021-05-29
categories:
- Physics
- Fluid mechanics
- Fluid dynamics
layout: "concept"
---
In fluid dynamics, the **Prandtl equations** or **boundary layer equations**
describe the movement of a [viscous](/know/concept/viscosity/) fluid
with a large [Reynolds number](/know/concept/reynolds-number/) $$\mathrm{Re} \gg 1$$
close to a solid surface.
Fluids with a large Reynolds number
are often approximated as having zero viscosity,
since the simpler [Euler equations](/know/concept/euler-equations)
can then be used instead of the [Navier-Stokes equations](/know/concept/navier-stokes-equations/).
However, in reality, a viscous fluid obeys the *no-slip* boundary condition:
at every solid surface the local velocity must be zero.
This implies the existence of a **boundary layer**:
a thin layer of fluid "stuck" to solid objects in the flow,
where viscosity plays an important role.
This is in contrast to the ideal flow far away from the surface.
We consider a simple theoretical case in 2D:
a large flat surface located at $$y = 0$$ for all $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$,
with a fluid *trying* to flow parallel to it at $$U$$.
The 2D treatment can be justified by assuming that everything is constant in the $$z$$-direction.
We will not solve this case,
but instead derive general equations
to describe the flow close to a flat surface.
At the wall, there is a very thin boundary layer of thickness $$\delta$$,
where the fluid is assumed to be completely stationary $$\va{v} = 0$$.
We are mainly interested in the region $$\delta < y \ll L$$,
where $$L$$ is the distance at which the fluid becomes practically ideal.
This the so-called **slip-flow** region,
in which the fluid is not stationary,
but still viscosity-dominated.
In 2D, the steady Navier-Stokes equations are as follows,
where the flow $$\va{v} = (v_x, v_y)$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
v_x \pdv{v_x}{x} + v_y \pdv{v_x}{y}
&= - \frac{1}{\rho} \pdv{p}{x} + \nu \Big( \pdvn{2}{v_x}{x} + \pdvn{2}{v_x}{y} \Big)
\\
v_x \pdv{v_y}{x} + v_y \pdv{v_y}{y}
&= - \frac{1}{\rho} \pdv{p}{y} + \nu \Big( \pdvn{2}{v_y}{x} + \pdvn{2}{v_y}{y} \Big)
\\
\pdv{v_x}{x} + \pdv{v_y}{y}
&= 0
\end{aligned}$$
The latter represents the fluid's incompressibility.
We non-dimensionalize these equations,
and assume that changes along the $$y$$-axis
happen on a short scale (say, $$\delta$$),
and along the $$x$$-axis on a longer scale (say, $$L$$).
Let $$\tilde{x}$$ and $$\tilde{y}$$ be dimenionless variables of order $$1$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
x
= L \tilde{x}
\qquad \quad
y
= \delta \tilde{x}
\qquad \quad
\pdv{}{x}
= \frac{1}{L} \pdv{}{\tilde{x}}
\qquad \quad
\pdv{}{y}
= \frac{1}{\delta} \pdv{}{\tilde{y}}
\end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, we choose velocity scales
to be consistent with the incompressibility condition,
and a pressure scale inspired
by [Bernoulli's theorem](/know/concept/bernoullis-theorem/):
$$\begin{aligned}
v_x
= U \tilde{v}_x
\qquad \quad
v_y
= \frac{U \delta}{L} \tilde{v}_y
\qquad \quad
p
= \rho U^2 \tilde{p}
\end{aligned}$$
We insert these scalings into the Navier-Stokes equations, yielding:
$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{U^2}{L} \tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{U^2}{L} \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \frac{U^2}{L} \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{x}}
+ \nu \Big( \frac{U}{L^2} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{U}{\delta^2} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}} \Big)
\\
\frac{U^2 \delta}{L^2} \tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{U^2 \delta}{L^2} \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \frac{U^2}{\delta} \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{y}}
+ \nu \Big( \frac{U \delta}{L^3} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{U}{L \delta} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}} \Big)
\end{aligned}$$
For future convenience,
we multiply the former equation by $$L / U^2$$, and the latter by $$\delta / U^2$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{x}}
+ \nu \Big( \frac{1}{U L} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{L}{U \delta^2} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}} \Big)
\\
\frac{\delta^2}{L^2} \tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{\delta^2}{L^2} \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{y}}
+ \nu \Big( \frac{\delta^2}{U L^3} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{1}{U L} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}} \Big)
\end{aligned}$$
We would like to estimate $$\delta$$.
Intuitively, we expect that higher viscosities $$\nu$$ give thicker layers,
and that faster velocities $$U$$ give thinner layers.
Furthermore, we expect *downstream thickening*:
with distance $$x$$, viscous stresses slow down the slip-flow,
leading to a gradual increase of $$\delta(x)$$.
Some dimensional analysis thus yields the following estimate:
$$\begin{aligned}
\delta
\approx \sqrt{\frac{\nu x}{U}}
\sim \sqrt{\frac{\nu L}{U}}
\end{aligned}$$
We thus insert $$\delta = \sqrt{\nu L / U}$$ into the Navier-Stokes equations, giving us:
$$\begin{aligned}
\tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{x}}
+ \nu \Big( \frac{1}{U L} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{1}{\nu} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}} \Big)
\\
\frac{\nu}{U L} \tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{\nu}{U L} \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{y}}
+ \nu \Big( \frac{\nu}{U^2 L^2} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{1}{U L} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}} \Big)
\end{aligned}$$
Here, we recognize the definition of the Reynolds number $$\mathrm{Re} = U L / \nu$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
\tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{x}}
+ \frac{1}{\mathrm{Re}} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{x}} + \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_x}{\tilde{y}}
\\
\frac{1}{\mathrm{Re}} \tilde{v}_x \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{1}{\mathrm{Re}} \tilde{v}_y \pdv{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}}
&= - \pdv{\tilde{p}}{\tilde{y}}
+ \frac{1}{\mathrm{Re}^2} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{x}} + \frac{1}{\mathrm{Re}} \pdvn{2}{\tilde{v}_y}{\tilde{y}}
\end{aligned}$$
Recall that we are only considering large Reynolds numbers $$\mathrm{Re} \gg 1$$,
in which case $$\mathrm{Re}^{-1} \ll 1$$,
so we can drop many terms, leaving us with these redimensionalized equations:
$$\begin{aligned}
v_x \pdv{v_x}{x} + v_y \pdv{v_x}{y}
= - \frac{1}{\rho} \pdv{p}{x} + \nu \pdvn{2}{v_x}{y}
\qquad \quad
\pdv{p}{y}
= 0
\end{aligned}$$
The second one tells us that for a given $$x$$-value,
the pressure is the same at the surface
as in the main flow $$y > L$$, where the fluid is ideal.
In the latter regime, we apply Bernoulli's theorem to rewrite $$p$$,
using the *Bernoulli head* $$H$$ and the mainstream velocity $$U(x)$$:
$$\begin{aligned}
p
= \rho H - \frac{1}{2} \rho U^2
= p_0 - \frac{1}{2} \rho U^2
\end{aligned}$$
Inserting this into the reduced Navier-Stokes equations,
we arrive at the Prandtl equations:
$$\begin{aligned}
\boxed{
v_x \pdv{v_x}{x} + v_y \pdv{v_x}{y}
= U \dv{U}{x} + \nu \pdvn{2}{v_x}{y}
\qquad \quad
\pdv{v_x}{x} + \pdv{v_y}{y}
= 0
}
\end{aligned}$$
A notable application of these equations is
the [Blasius boundary layer](/know/concept/blasius-boundary-layer/),
where the surface in question
is a semi-infinite plane.
## References
1. B. Lautrup,
*Physics of continuous matter: exotic and everyday phenomena in the macroscopic world*, 2nd edition,
CRC Press.
|